Thought that was a build up to a Steps song.I know as much as any of the rest of you lunatics.
At least we've ruled out 8.I know as much as any of the rest of you lunatics.
Been told its 7
I definitely see your point there. It just seems wrong to reward the minted clubs who finish near the top with even more money.3 games to go, a team like Wolves would just play all the kids, give them experience, while also not minding if they finish 15th instead of 9th. Set them up nicely for the following season with a bigger budget. Hard to make it equitable.
Some some sort of squashing of the gap between top and bottom teams could work. F1 teams get more wind tunnel time for the following season the lower they finish. The issue is making the upside down reward big enough to make a difference, but small enough to not randomly damage any top teams that have EARNT their place at the top (rather than cheating/overspending), which muddies the rewards for sporting excellence.
Yes, that would be better than what we have today.or at the very least, everyone gets the same flat fee. People watch the PL because of the competition as a whole Sheffield United are playing their bit too every bit as much as the others and their games count for 3 points also
We haven't been deducted six points yet !I've heard it's a good case we presented & our 6 points has been reduced to 4 like Forests .....
We have its being reduced to 4 like Forests - 6 points from the first breach & we spent 30% less than Forest ....We haven't been deducted six points yet !
It's the second hearing decision this week, our previous appeal was reduced from 10 to 6, we haven't appealed the appeal.We have its being reduced to 4 like Forests - 6 points from the first breach & we spent 30% less than Forest ....
I've heard it's a good case we presented & our 6 points has been reduced to 4 like Forests .....