6 + 2 Point Deductions

[MikeH72]

Listen to this ironically named bitter b*stard Gary Sweet, CEO of Luton town. What a club of whinging little tramps...

I absolutely hate them, horrible tinpot scruffs.

 

[DanEFC92]

Listen to this ironically named bitter b*stard Gary Sweet, CEO of Luton town. What a club of whinging little tramps...

Obviously it'll benefit us if they do go down so it's obvious to say. But i'd love to see them down.

 

[Evertonthat]

Not sure if this has already been posted on here, but sky sports news have gone in on the PL with this youtube vid...

 

[Lobworm]

The Tories won't be in power again in most of our lifetimes so it's a moot point.

The tories wearing blue rosettes, maybe will be gone for a term or two. But never, ever underestimate the stupidity and naivety of the British public.

 

[Victus]

Look if you can't stay up in a season where two teams have had points deducted then you simply weren't good enough on the pitch. It's as simple as that.

 

[Wat Tyler]

How much will we need to make before 30 June then?



The latest verdict also sets out the totals of the PSR breaches attributed, at this stage to Everton. These are the underlying losses for each year, minus sums that can be deducted from the calculations - typically figures for issues like women’s and youth teams and infrastructure.

Everton lost, in PSR terms, £3.9m in 2021/22 and £62.7m in 2022/23. This means that when this financial year ends on June 30, Everton will need to ensure the club has lost no more than around £38m to avoid another breach.

 

[ToffeeTim]

Listen to this ironically named bitter b*stard Gary Sweet, CEO of Luton town. What a club of whinging little tramps...

Their only chance of survival is due to points deductions to 2 rivals. If they stay up it certainly won't be on merit.

 

[Goat]

How much will we need to make before 30 June then?



The latest verdict also sets out the totals of the PSR breaches attributed, at this stage to Everton. These are the underlying losses for each year, minus sums that can be deducted from the calculations - typically figures for issues like women’s and youth teams and infrastructure.

Everton lost, in PSR terms, £3.9m in 2021/22 and £62.7m in 2022/23. This means that when this financial year ends on June 30, Everton will need to ensure the club has lost no more than around £38m to avoid another breach.

Be interesting to know when the Beto and Chermo payments need to be made by.

You would assume after 1st July, but who knows.

Theres 40m straight off the bat, but they might have already been factored it.

 

[Tony’s Carp]

Their only chance of survival is due to points deductions to 2 rivals. If they stay up it certainly won't be on merit.

And it’ll be because of breaches that occurred before they joined the league. They are unbelievably lucky to even have a sniff of survival because of this

 

[Tony’s Carp]

Be interesting to know when the Beto and Chermo payments need to be made by.

You would assume after 1st July, but who knows.

Theres 40m straight off the bat, but they might have already been factored it.

That’s not how amortisation works at all.

 

[ToffeeTim]

Be interesting to know when the Beto and Chermo payments need to be made by.

You would assume after 1st July, but who knows.

Theres 40m straight off the bat, but they might have already been factored it.

Those players will already be on our books at full value, and amortised in FY24. The fact we haven't paid doesn't really matter for PSR. It just means we will have creditors for the fees still to be paid.

You recognise the value of the players at full value in the year they sign, regardless of the initial payment.

 

[Goat]

That’s not how amortisation works at all.

I know mate, hence me saying its probably been factored in.

Although payments were "delayed" , they are very much on our balance sheet.

 

[davek]

Listen to this ironically named bitter b*stard Gary Sweet, CEO of Luton town. What a club of whinging little tramps...

Play that to the team in the dressing room before we go out and face them in a few weeks time.

 

[Goat]

Play that to the team in the dressing room before we go out and play them in a few weeks time.

Probably more effective than the monotone team talk from Dyche.

 

[RD2910]

Honestly, the guy is an absolute idiot. He's out of his depth and just riffing at this point.

We know what has been said, we've all read it, but that does nothing at all to prove that a sporting g advantage was gained. It has only ever been inferred, nothing more. In fact, I'm pretty confident that they even say it can't be quantified but has to be inferred due to the Sheffield case (though this time round we can't use EFL case guidance is the abscence of PL r&r)

I absolutely agree with you about sporting advantage, I think it's nonsense, but how would you define inferred? It means they concluded there was one, it doesn't mean they weren't sure about it. Not the same as implied, I guess I'm saying.