Yeah, they can't book the sale of an asset during the prior fiscal year if it occurs after the reporting date. It's a nonsense defense.
I weren’t suggesting they’d lend to us below market rate, I’m merely stating they’d still make a lot on a loan of that size.
I get they’re also risking a lot by lending a basket case like us those sums of money, so I kind of get it.
Tbh I’m just struggling to get my head around how bollocksed we actually are.
![]()
Nottingham Forest: Club expect to avoid FIFA punishment over transfer administration error
Nottingham Forest expect to avoid FIFA punishment despite a transfer admin error regarding Jonjo Shelveys move to Trabzonspor last summer; the transfer was initially a loan that breached FIFAs rules on the number of international loans allowed which is seven per clubwww.skysports.com
No punishment for Notts.
Agree but in what world taking £20m less 60 days earlier helps the club be financially responsible and sustainable.
If we could have held on and sold Richy for £70/80m for instance, thats much better for the club financially.
Newcastle can spend if they sell one of their best players, how does that help them improve.
Rules are a shambles and the more clubs at risk and kick off the better.
![]()
Nottingham Forest: Club expect to avoid FIFA punishment over transfer administration error
Nottingham Forest expect to avoid FIFA punishment despite a transfer admin error regarding Jonjo Shelveys move to Trabzonspor last summer; the transfer was initially a loan that breached FIFAs rules on the number of international loans allowed which is seven per clubwww.skysports.com
No punishment for Notts.
That lad failed to say this is about Shelvey.Just adds more to our appeal surely?
Not charging Notts because they know they will have to give us our points back?
Not charging Notts because they're not EvertonJust adds more to our appeal surely?
Not charging Notts because they know they will have to give us our points back?
Wouldn’t hold my breath like.Just adds more to our appeal surely?
Not charging Notts because they know they will have to give us our points back?
Not even strange just even more stupid they went had no problem with giving us the max punishemnt but not even a fine for that for forest patheticLet’s have it right. This is not about ffp. However it’s strange that they have not been punished.
Course not, they're not a merseyside club bankrolled by nasty Russians![]()
Nottingham Forest: Club expect to avoid FIFA punishment over transfer administration error
Nottingham Forest expect to avoid FIFA punishment despite a transfer admin error regarding Jonjo Shelveys move to Trabzonspor last summer; the transfer was initially a loan that breached FIFAs rules on the number of international loans allowed which is seven per clubwww.skysports.com
No punishment for Notts.
Maybe because they will have to charge Chelsea, because haven’t they a similar complaint regarding transfers . Will probably still punish them for PSR, so it ties in with usLet’s have it right. This is not about ffp. However it’s strange that they have not been punished.
Going forward UEFA have already changes in that irrespective of a clubs accounting period playertrading , when it comes to squad % costs, will be over two transfer windows. It’s inevitable that the PL will followThere has to be a cutoff date in order to apply the rules, or there would be no rules to apply.
They can't make an argument saying they knew at 06/30/2023 that Johnson would garner 20m more and not injure himself before the transfer.
The sustainable part would have been not buying and paying all those mediocre or worse players (for both clubs). Then the financial need to sell those players is removed.