Kevsleftpeg
Player Valuation: £8m
You're a bit dim mate if you can't follow this argument.The two breaches are a year apart. The first was for a rolling period ending 2022. The second is for a rolling period ending 2023.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You're a bit dim mate if you can't follow this argument.The two breaches are a year apart. The first was for a rolling period ending 2022. The second is for a rolling period ending 2023.
take a select few that can be proved and ask City to TIC the restI find this argument baffling. If there are 115 charges then investigate one and then sanction them. Then do another one and sanction them for that.
Don’t say that all 115 need to be investigated before anything happens.
RS mate, they've done well to type semi coherent sentences.You're a bit dim mate if you can't follow this argument.
Two point deduction for failing to control your playersJust get 11 points clear by the last game and get each player to wipe his arse on the Premier League flag.
You're a bit dim mate if you can't follow this argument.
The two breaches are a year apart. The first was for a rolling period ending 2022. The second is for a rolling period ending 2023.
He is a Liv troll mate. Best to place on ignore
It means we want to mitigate part of our spending on the stadium but this was rejected by the Commission for the previous 3 year period, so pending our appeal we have to use their interpretation.Anyone have a clue what this part of our statement means?
"The club has no option but to submit a PSR calculation which remains subject to change pending the outcome of the appeal"
Or your players bowelsTwo point deduction for failing to control your players