I'm fairly sure City's charges include a few for PSR
6 + 2 Point Deductions
- Thread starter GrandOldTeam
- Start date
WestStandLower
Player Valuation: £1.5m
Sorry but those won’t be the numbers that feature in the accounts.
The player trading profit can’t be established by just looking at fees received you have to factor in things such as what was the fee paid ( if any ) when they signed, how many years have elapsed since they signed for the club ( that’s called amortisation)
A player that comes through the academy has nil value in the accounts so sell them and every £ is profit. Whereas if you sign a player for say £50 million on a 5 year deal you write their value down by £10 million a year . So sell him after 1 years for £50 million that’s actually a profit of £10 million. Sell them for £30 million it’s a loss of £10 million.
Selling Richarlinson who had time on his original contract left still happy value so not all his fee was profit
Yes, indeed, to show they broke PSR they will need to prove the other charges, they all tie in.
There's no good argument why their PSR charges aren't being heard at the same time as Everton and Forest.
Maybe
But in order to charge then presumably the league believe they have a case. So there is no good argument to delay those specific charges at the same time they are hearing two charges for us in the same league season.
Bluepablo
Player Valuation: £950k
If the loss for 2021is £55m & 2022 is 10m as per the report then last years losses must exceed £40m to breach the £105m 3 year cap.
On that basis we are probably looking at a further 6 point deduction.
Per para 214 Forest will probably get their deduction halved so 3 for them?
On that basis we are probably looking at a further 6 point deduction.
Per para 214 Forest will probably get their deduction halved so 3 for them?
Myllos
Player Valuation: £150k
In regards of the second breach accusation I think that we are arguing that we had no possibility to avoid the second breach to begin with. If we had been made aware of the PL math before last summer we could have avoided the second breach.
This coupled with the notion of double jeopardy and PL changing rules on the fly I choose to be optimistic. I'm not letting the corrupted league to dictate how I feel anymore. [Poor language removed] em. We shall not be moved!
As it is evident to see that PL has absolutely no common sense, I do hope that the comission of the 2nd breach accusation see it as it is. A complete incompetent PL mess.
This coupled with the notion of double jeopardy and PL changing rules on the fly I choose to be optimistic. I'm not letting the corrupted league to dictate how I feel anymore. [Poor language removed] em. We shall not be moved!
As it is evident to see that PL has absolutely no common sense, I do hope that the comission of the 2nd breach accusation see it as it is. A complete incompetent PL mess.
WestStandLower
Player Valuation: £1.5m
Apologies my mistake and yes it will feature in the 22/23 statutory accounts but the bad news is ( if the report is correct ) that because it was an obligation to buy as opposed to an option to buy that means for PS purposes the fee would have been factored in earlier namely the date the obligation was signed offNot so mate, the deal was completed in financial year 22/23.
Everton's Kean rejoins Juventus on permanent deal
Italy striker Moise Kean rejoins Juventus from Everton on a permanent deal for £25m.www.bbc.com
Well, I honestly havent looked into City that much.
I think they are telling the PL to prove it and as yet, they cant.
But as above, havent bothered much with them, cos I really dont care enough.
Why would any Forest penalty be halved under that section?If the loss for 2021is £55m & 2022 is 10m as per the report then last years losses must exceed £40m to breach the £105m 3 year cap.
On that basis we are probably looking at a further 6 point deduction.
Per para 214 Forest will probably get their deduction halved so 3 for them?
Anything could happen but I don't follow the argument here
Tony’s Carp
Player Valuation: £40m
I think you’re looking at this the wrong way round. The direct PSR charges will be the last domino to fall. The other charges are about fraudulent behaviour to circumvent PSR. At present they are PSR compliant so there is nothing to punish. If you prove the other charges only then you can hold them in breach.
I haven't looked into the specifics for them either. Not saying they are guilty or innocent either because i obviously dont know. I just think their PSR charges should be getting heard now too alongside other clubs.
Are City being done for PSR though? I thought their charges are really wide-ranging.
If the loss for 2021is £55m & 2022 is 10m as per the report then last years losses must exceed £40m to breach the £105m 3 year cap.
On that basis we are probably looking at a further 6 point deduction.
Per para 214 Forest will probably get their deduction halved so 3 for them?
Erm what?
