ForestAreMagic
Player Valuation: £150k
Where was this when it was just us getting the deductions?
In the bin
Well no club’s going to appeal against a punishment it hasn’t yet been given. What did you expect Forest to do?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Where was this when it was just us getting the deductions?
In the bin
They want balanced books over a specific accounting period which Forest intentionally ignored.
Do you think we would have had that accepted if we hadn't sold Richarlison and gone over the limit by even more? I don't for a second.
So it's not about sustainability then.. more about the 6 being able to harvest other sides best players on the cheap because compliance must be adhered to..... we may see that we need 30 million to comply this June.. oh oh here comes Liverpool with a 30 million bid for Braithwaite on the 30th of June and they have just snagged one of England's top prospects for a 60% discount because Everton need to comply, could have had 70 million 2 days later without these rules in place..But the PL insist we take the lower amount, sustainability my arse. It’s BS and anyone arguing for it needs to lay off the crack.Get in the bin with this utter bollocks.
The rules are to ensure clubs aren't losing more than a given amount of money over rolling three year periods. In order to comply you would have had to sell him within that established time period. You chose not to.
How far down the line from the accounting cut off do Forest fans consider fair? If you could wait until next year and he adds 20 mil to his value should that count against the previous years accounts? Obviously it shouldn't and that's as nonsensical as the arguments over the Johnson sale.
The time for solidarity was when we needed a hand, you've been treated with kid gloves by comparison to us so don't look for any comradery from me. I'd bet not a single one of you forest fans lost any sleep over our first deduction. I'm not losing any over yours.
HE says we are bottom half, despite none of the data he uses supporting his comment.It says we are now a bottom half team so sad this once great club of ours
Tory behaviour
Forest won`t go up whereas we will get more points deducted. I think we got another 4 coming...If Forest hadnt appealed i think we may have been successful on a double jeopardy defence for this 2nd charge.
Reading between the lines, that would mean the league could wrap everything up without going post season.
But with Forest appealing it could go either way. The logic says that we get 0-3pts and forest go from 4pts up to 6pts.
If we didn't have the points deduction then relegation wouldn't really be a consideration this season.We should want as many clubs kicking up a fuss as possible.
Of course we want Everton to "win", but if we can see Forest bloody their nose as well, well im all for that.
If we go down this season, im sorry to say, but we will have nobody to blame but ourselves.
We had 38 games to not get relegated.
Tories and Labour, both one and the same these days, both cheeks of the same arse.Forest fans
The ultimate Tory snakes
I am surprised they have appealed , it is hard to argue they didn't get an advantage having Brennan Johnson in the team. They got a huge fee for the player which would suggest he was their best player/most valuable asset then you would think that having your best player in the team gives you an advantage.Forest also won 4 points in that time, with Johnson scoring and assisting.
If they get points off I think a lot of teams will feel they`ve got carte blanche for £35m overspend, if they sell a player after the deadline, to get 2 deducted if they comply.yeah. they effectively said - 'we don't think that the squad who got us promoted were good enough, so we deliberatley flouted the rules in order to buy better players' (effectively stopping other clubs who didn't breach the rules from buying those same players). 'Then we knew we could sell Johnson and still stay within the rules but didn't want to.......so we didn't'. They should be f*****d! The rues are the rules. It's easy to follow them when it has little to no negative affect on you, the acid test is - do you 'stay legal' when it would benefit you more not to?
Tory behaviour
yeah. they effectively said - 'we don't think that the squad who got us promoted were good enough, so we deliberatley flouted the rules in order to buy better players' (effectively stopping other clubs who didn't breach the rules from buying those same players). 'Then we knew we could sell Johnson and still stay within the rules but didn't want to.......so we didn't'. They should be f*****d! The rues are the rules. It's easy to follow them when it has little to no negative affect on you, the acid test is - do you 'stay legal' when it would benefit you more not to?