Surely having different independent commission panels for every hearing is a major flaw in all of this.
Each panel is going to view and interpret certain rules, behaviours and mitigations in different ways coming up with varying decisions and penalties. Can even see that with the reports so far that one panel doesn't know how the other came up with certain decisions. Especially when it seems there is no clear format of how penalties are given nor written in stone.
To have one commission panel overseeing every hearing within a season would mean both parties are singing off the same hymn sheet. In theory it should mean that the decision of the panel's punishment for one club regarding losses etc will be proportional to the next club's hearing decision and on and on for that season. Rather than different panels coming up with totally different punishments.
Then have a different panel for the appeal hearings but keep the panel the same for each appeal hearing throughout one full season