777 Partners / Whatever the hell you like

Revised Polling options on who wants a 777 takeover


  • Total voters
    676
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.
The media narrative of 'Plucky Everton' was driven by the former Chairman and his willing accomplice, Moyes.

"Look how well we're doing!"

We'd have been doing even better with a bit of investment, even spending some of our own money earned from TV and prize money rather than spending it on 'other operating costs' that spiralled under Kenwright.

Everton FC. The first Leveraged buyout if the premier League era.

Clap! Clap! Clap!
The incrementally higher annual 'Other expenses' under the Kenwright era need proper analysis. Lawnmowers and blue gravel around the pitch? We didnt even get the tat cladding on the outside of GP until Moshiri era paid for that.

Stinks.
 
I just asked or posed similar question in the Moshiri thread. Whatever money they have put in, for me sounds like they may fail to get back, however if it was dependant on clauses and 777 didnt meet those clauses, will it be payable back, or if, as is looking a possibility 777 go to the wall, will it be/could it be written off?

I don't know the answer but I'm sure some in here will? not sure how this side pans out but if 777 do go to the wall it would seem that money to us is dead for them?
No expert, but even if they go to the wall they'll have administrators appointed to try and recover whatever they can on behalf of those they owe.

Nobody is sure, but it's widely reported that the 777 money is a very junior debt and has no security in terms of stadium or ckub share attached. (This only triggers on completion)

I don't think the club (whoever owns us) would be under massive pressure to pay them back. I suppose it's also a possibility a deal may be done to pay the administrator a much smaller percentage of what was loaned for a speedy resolution.
 
I just asked or posed similar question in the Moshiri thread. Whatever money they have put in, for me sounds like they may fail to get back, however if it was dependant on clauses and 777 didnt meet those clauses, will it be payable back, or if, as is looking a possibility 777 go to the wall, will it be/could it be written off?

I don't know the answer but I'm sure some in here will? not sure how this side pans out but if 777 do go to the wall it would seem that money to us is dead for them?
I'll bet some of the lawyers acting for those to whom 777 owe money will absolutely have an eye on taking a % share of BMD as indirect recovery of their bad loans. Their chances of this are questionable but they will definitely be planning for this.
 

Everton FC Pursued by Another US Investor as 777 Takeover Falters​

  • McLaren F1 backer was in talks to invest in club last year
  • 777 already asked for more time to complete lengthy takeover


Gift this article

In this Article​

CAPITAL PARTNERS
Private Company
Have a confidential tip for our reporters? Get in Touch
Before it’s here, it’s on the Bloomberg Terminal
LEARN MORE
By Jamie Nimmo and David Hellier
May 9, 2024 at 12:42 AM GMT+1
Updated on
May 9, 2024 at 9:02 AM GMT+1
Save

Listen
3:59

Sign up for Bloomberg's Business of Sports newsletter for the context you need on the collision of power, money and sports.
US investment firm MSP Sports Capital is exploring a takeover of Everton FC as the current bid for the Premier League football club falters, according to a person familiar with the matter.
MSP, which has lent money to fund the Liverpool-based club’s new stadium, is looking at its options, given the existing offer by rival firm 777 Partners is now under threat, the person said, asking not to be identified discussing confidential information.
Representatives for MSP and 777 declined to comment, as did a spokesman for Farhad Moshiri, Everton’s majority shareholder.
Everton has held talks with restructuring advisers after 777 struggled to complete its takeover from Moshiri, Bloomberg reported last week. The Miami-based investor agreed to buy the football club last September, but talks have dragged on, and the firm recently asked for more time.
While awaiting Premier League approval for its bid, 777 has lent Everton around $200 million. Josh Wander, co-founder of 777, and some of his colleagues have been frequent attendees at Everton’s matches.

777’s long-standing pursuit of Everton has hinged on repaying a £158 million ($198 million) loan to a group of investors led by MSP. The loan was due to be paid on April 15, but 777 gained a last-minute extension.
New York-based MSP considered investing in Everton last year, but talks collapsed without a deal. Its other investments include a stake in the McLaren Formula One team, and European football clubs such as Brondby in Denmark, Augsburg of Germany and Estoril in Portugal.
The firm is headed by Jeff Moorad, a former sports agent who was previously a part-owner and chief executive officer of both the Arizona Diamondbacks and San Diego Padres baseball teams. Moorad founded MSP in 2019 with chairman Jahm Najafi, who is vice-chairman of the Phoenix Suns and has a stake in the basketball team separately.
Read More: Everton FC Buyer Accused of Fraud, Double-Pledging Assets

Last week, lenders to 777 accused it of fraud, claiming that the firm borrowed against $350 million of assets that it didn’t own, that didn’t exist or were already promised to someone else. Leadenhall Capital Partners LLP and Leadenhall Life Insurance Linked Investments Fund Plc filed a complaint in a New York federal court, alleging that Wander double-pledged assets backing loans to the firm in a breach of agreements. 777 hasn’t commented on the allegations.
GDA Luma Capital, a private equity firm specializing in distressed debt, has held talks about offering financing to 777 to enable it to continue funding the construction of Everton’s new stadium and meet ongoing capital requirements, Bloomberg also reported last week.

Multiclub model​

777, whose business activities include insurance and aviation, began investing in football teams in the aftermath of Covid. It has followed the so-called multiclub model deployed by a number of groups, including Manchester City’s parent company City Football Group, Eagle Football and Red Bull.

Its stable of teams range from Genoa in Italy’s Serie A to Vasco da Gama in Brazil. The teams’ performances have been mixed, with Red Star Paris winning promotion this season to France’s second tier and its Belgian team Standard Liege having one of its worst seasons ever.
Some of 777’s clubs have faced financial issues, and earlier this week Standard Liege was hit with a transfer ban.
Everton would have been 777’s highest revenue-generating asset, as broadcast income in the Premier League is the highest in Europe.
Everton recently cemented its place in next season’s Premier League after flirting with relegation — again — from the lucrative division. The club was docked eight points for financial breaches but has still done well enough to finish above the bottom three. Premier League football comes with minimum annual broadcast fees of £100 million.

MSP would've have their feet under the table with us already if it wasn't for Kenwright, Mosh and all the R&M Fund sharks eyeing up some other skirt (777).

Not surprised they'd be sniffing again as they have a piece.
 
The incrementally higher annual 'Other expenses' under the Kenwright era need proper analysis. Lawnmowers and blue gravel around the pitch? We didnt even get the tat cladding on the outside of GP until Moshiri era paid for that.

Stinks.
It was questions about these ever increasing costs that led to him cancelling AGMs the first time round.

He got properly rattled when people kept asking him. lol
 

Whoever comes in instead need to put Everton first.

8phiff.webp



I can dig it.
 
Is it a possibility that new owners could let 777 have their equity and then wait for the administrators to inevitably take control of 777 in the near future, at which time the new owners could buy 777s share from the administrators for far less than 200 mill? Or is that too simple, I'm not sure how these things work?
If it was as simple as them not having the dough for a full takeover it would be a possible option to convert their debt to minority equity and have them as silent partners rather than creditors. If they had a viable football business there may even have been benefits to this in terms of accessing their multi club setup.

But the way things are collapsing in on them I don’t think that’s a viable option, if you give them equity then with all their assets being fought over by the likes of ACAP or Leadenhall you have no idea where those shares end up. And while the fraud allegations right now are civil there is a definite possibility of criminality and I don’t think credible investors would want the hassle of being in any way associated with them.
 
Yeah. I’m sure us all waving flags and carrying dogs through the street is far more influential on hard nosed investors than the fact we’ve barely stayed in the league three years on the spin.
It's for a whole host of reasons why people buy football clubs. It's never straight forward. Who predicted Man City would become the richest club in the world? Certainly nobody predicted it. People argue to this day why City were picked. I think our supporters' passion over the last few relegation battles will not have done us any harm. I look forward to hearing it referenced in the first press conference held by our next super wealthy incumbents in the near future.
 
Yeah. I’m sure us all waving flags and carrying dogs through the street is far more influential on hard nosed investors than the fact we’ve barely stayed in the league three years on the spin.

Myra the dog will forever be part of Everton folklore.... Lovely little mush.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_20240509_113442.webp
    IMG_20240509_113442.webp
    93.4 KB · Views: 10
MSP would've have their feet under the table with us already if it wasn't for Kenwright, Mosh and all the R&M Fund sharks eyeing up some other skirt (777).

Not surprised they'd be sniffing again as they have a piece.

To be clear, MSP (whilst being a preferable option to 777) are not a magic bullet. They're an investment vehicle and their sole objective in buying us is a return for the investors. They see us as an opportunity given the stadium to dramatically increase revenues. That's all well and good, but there's really only two main objectives of an investment like this - income or capital growth or a combination of the two. If it's the former then MSP investors would potentially be receiving a dividend which comes out of any growth in our commercial revenues and that would affect our ability to reinvest back into the team. If it's capital growth (which is hugely preferable), they'll be here a few years while they turn us around, grow our revenue base and then sell us at a profit. There's no benevolence here, they aren't going to be buying us as a community asset or anything, they want to buy us and make money out of us.

The club itself is worth literally nothing as things stand given the debt levels. The one and only attractive asset is the stadium and the potentially transformative revenues it has the potential to generate. You either need a benefactor type who wants the asset for a trophy or political purposes, or you need an investor who's going to get the club into the shape it needs to be for its own future.
 

Status
Not open for further replies.

Welcome to GrandOldTeam

Get involved. Registration is simple and free.

Back
Top