mightymoyes
Player Valuation: £70m
Both of them don't come out looking too well on whoscored either.
Think that was his point
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Both of them don't come out looking too well on whoscored either.
Think that was his point
No he's saying they look good from the stats angle. When they in fact don't. If anything Gomes looks better on the eye rather than what his stats reveal.
No he's saying they look good from the stats angle. When they in fact don't. If anything Gomes looks better on the eye rather than what his stats reveal.
I honestly can't see how you've read my post and think that's what I said.No he's saying they look good from the stats angle. When they in fact don't. If anything Gomes looks better on the eye rather than what his stats reveal.
Have you seen how little assists Gomes got this season? Can't believe we're wasting so much money on someone so uncreative.My mistake. Thought Archer was implying they are look crap on the eye and because the stats said they were good before they were signed, that means the stats angle is not so correct.
I see you meant it the other way.
Not sure why as Bernard has proved to be not so good at all. 1 goal and 3 assists is a shocking return for a wide forward. We need to upgrade on him big time.
Especially when there are toddlers in the french second division who would walk into any PL team tomorrowHave you seen how little assists Gomes got this season? Can't believe we're wasting so much money on someone so uncreative.
Or that you know nothing about stats.It'll be a sad day for the stat gimps when he signs. Him and Bernard are proof that stats for the most part are meaningless and you should judge a player using your eyes instead of whoscored.com
Or that you're a massive stat nonce.Or that you know nothing about stats.
If that means I actually understand them, then I'm fine with that. But to declare that someone is BAD yet GOOD according to stats, just makes ZERO sense. Then you aren't using the right stats. Or you can't evaluate talent properly and don't understand football.Or that you're a massive stat nonce.
They only go so far though. There's that comparison going round that defensively Titus Bramble has had a better season than Van Dijk statistically speaking.If that means I actually understand them, then I'm fine with that. But to declare that someone is BAD yet GOOD according to stats, just makes ZERO sense. Then you aren't using the right stats. Or you can't evaluate talent properly and don't understand football.
I am not sure you haven’t misinterpreted his point...No he's saying they look good from the stats angle. When they in fact don't. If anything Gomes looks better on the eye rather than what his stats reveal.