And who's suggested otherwise?
Everyone who's using the money as justification
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
And who's suggested otherwise?
That’s not what I’m saying
Never has been what I’ve been saying
Never will be what I say
All I am saying is be fair and don’t massacre players for average performances, especially if they’re young
Young players should be graded on a curve, because they are still developing, so if a young lad goes in there and plays fine then that’s not grounds to slaughter them
Gordon has entered two average performances and people are going on like he was awful
There’s WAY more of ultra negativity than there is of OTT positivity
If you judge him as a young player leading the line in the hardest league in the world for the first time, then yes, he did ok.
But as a player leading the line for Everton, I thought he did poorly and along with the majority of our attacking players failed to build attacks.
This thread sums up evertonians, here we have a young player who newcastle are looking at as they plan to build a squad to challenge and have identified him as a part of it, and Chelsea who are alot closer are interested, and instead of looking at it and thinking we might have a player we can build a team around, people here want to sell ASAP because everton lost a couple of games and he hasn't looked good being played out of position
@MikelsGoat
But you said "That's the club's fault, not his..." - who's saying Gordon is at fault?Everyone who's using the money as justification
Very true he will be " set free " soon enough .If he has a great season or two then he’ll leave anyway. Not worth getting too attached to players.
No, I really don't. We don't have the luxury of holding onto players because they might be really good in 2-3 years, we need quality now. The clubs after him do have that luxury.
I would have given them all a 4, at no point, not saying you said I was, but at no point have I personally singled Gordon out, I havent even "blamed" Lampard, there were very few option. I think playing Gordon up top for a 2nd time was complete lunacy by the way, but very few real options.Fair enough.
I dont think he was wonderful, I'd give him a 6, when the others up to have been a 4. But people seem to be singling him out as a 2, who is dragging other good performing players down.
I also agree, he isnt good enough to be leading our line. But he should be judged in his position, which is playing wide.
Also worth saying, a 6, for a 21 year old, is not that bad. Like McNeil has been a 4, but deserves time too.
This thread sums up evertonians, here we have a young player who newcastle are looking at as they plan to build a squad to challenge and have identified him as a part of it, and Chelsea who are alot closer are interested, and instead of looking at it and thinking we might have a player we can build a team around, people here want to sell ASAP because everton lost a couple of games and he hasn't looked good being played out of position
@MikelsGoat
Its easy to be more objective as a neutral in a game you don't care about than when your own side are losing and carrying no goal threat.
He was poor and offered no threat, but not at all unexpected playing as a 9. I dont see what there is to gain here from saying he had a good game when he didn't. He could and maybe should have put that one away near the end and thats the fine margins in football. I have little doubt he will get better in front of goal but right this moment, he is lacking a bit of composure.
We dont want to become a team where nearly is good enough. We need to raise standards pretty urgently.
If he has a great season or two then he’ll leave anyway. Not worth getting too attached to players.
If real life was Football Manager we could hack the database and see what Gordons PA was.Too many on here think Football Manager is the real deal.