For starters I’ll speak for the advocation of selling AG had little to do with questioning his merit as a prospect. It’s his value correlated to his possible future value and our ability to reinvest that money for more value propositions than just him. A consideration mainly based on a generally poor squad that has few pathways for sell on potential and thus reinvestment.
I like Gordon and hope he continues his upward trajectory, but turning down this offer, if it ultimately was 60 million comes at a very high risk.
The argument at least in my part is far more nuanced than questioning his quality or not liking him. Brighton did not sell Cucurella from questioning his quality. Nor was that the case for the Ben White deal they did a year prior that 1.5/5th of you could say paid for acquiring Cucurella. Factoring that initial deal with Getafe, they still ended up 100 million net between those two players that lends to finding more players. Each year there resources and ability for risk get stronger because so.
Questioning not taking the Chelsea deal is more a reflection of a club that often is prisoner of the moment or seeks immediate gratification in its business. A dynamic that each year seems to make a worse squad with worse results with less avenues for correction. Being wary of that potential repeating itself I’d argue is pragmatic oppose to nonsense.
All that said rooting for him to continue to mature and that the club are proven right. He’s a fun player removed of the noise.