Can they take Gray as well
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Willing to bet that McNeil has more G/A than Gordon at seasons end.
Sausage and chips as a wager from the Goodison Supper Bar and you're onHas any one person on this forum said both of these things? Or are you reading the opinion of several different people as one voice?
Yep. An academy kid who has got 4 goals and 3 assists in 51 Prem appearances but "works hard" should not be compared to Richy's importance in the team. If Chelsea are daft enough to pay £40-50m for perceived potential we should take it and reinvest.I think you're argument stands with Richy. I don't think we'll be able to replace him with someone better. With Gordon I think we'll replace him easily.
At the moment he's closer to Davies in quality than he is Richarlison. I'm baffled this is a real bid.
£62m for Cucurella, £40 for Gordon, no thanks
Demz Gray was more important and people would sell him in a flash.Terrible shouts from our fans wanting to sell a young developing local talent to scrape around for a replacement. Almost like they forgot how important he was to us staying up in his first full professional season and he's currently being played out of position.
Where's the £60M from Richarlison?Where is the indication that we wouldnt reinvest all the money? Im sure Lampard would only agree if he got the money to spend
£62m for Cucurella, £40 for Gordon, no thanks
Damn rightDemz Gray was more important and people would sell him in a flash.
Where's the £60M from Richarlison?
Onana, Tarks, Coady, Vingare and McNeil, theres your 60m.Where's the £60M from Richarlison?
McNeil was £16M, Onana £30M.Onana, Tarks, Coady, Vingare and McNeil, theres your 60m.