Does that rule still exist? I thought they banned it, but could be wrong
your right mate, they abolished that rule years ago, I think it's just the norm that's agreed by the clubs that said player won't play.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Does that rule still exist? I thought they banned it, but could be wrong
Think you're splitting hairs a bit here, he looked dangerous and annoying to play against, he fed off of scraps and caused them a few issues.Thought he was 'ok'.
Looked more threatening than DCL (not hard) but defensively didnt cut out passing lanes or really put himself about too much.
Think you're splitting hairs a bit here, he looked dangerous and annoying to play against, he fed off of scraps and caused them a few issues.
He did DCLs thankless job - v lesser teams like to see them both upfront tbh !Think you're splitting hairs a bit here, he looked dangerous and annoying to play against, he fed off of scraps and caused them a few issues.
DCL had a good game - tired - made sense to give Broja a run out - he soon found the role is very hard,I've liked the look of him in his two cameos. Today in particular he looked up for the fight.
DCL had a good game - tired - made sense to give Broja a run out - he soon found the role is very hard,
The ref let us down today when DCL created in the move for Doucs to miss he was fouled & not allowed to be our extra man in the move ....The ref rarely gave us anything too!And very lonely.
The only way we’ll see him in a partnership is a change of manager.Looks strong and is a unit. Think he could do well for us. Like to see him in a partnership though rather than a lone striker
I am assuming he can’t play against Cheksea next weekend but I would have Broja start ahead of DCL at City on Boxing Day.
He’s a lot bigger and stronger looking than what I thought.