Boss photos you've taken

@Seathestars

Double digit cameras are amateur/semi-pro level and have cropped sensors, good for wildlife because of the 1.6 crop factor, but they have more digital noise.

90D is quality (out of my budget) but 32mp is astonishing. The lenses, well if you can afford Canon's L series you're onto a winner, but also onto another mortgage!

If you want Nikon, then perhaps the D850.

Paul.
 

Bilbo said:
@Seathestars

Double digit cameras are amateur/semi-pro level and have cropped sensors, good for wildlife because of the 1.6 crop factor, but they have more digital noise.

90D is quality (out of my budget) but 32mp is astonishing. The lenses, well if you can afford Canon's L series you're onto a winner, but also onto another mortgage!

If you want Nikon, then perhaps the D850.

Paul.
Click to expand...
Ok thanks, you have the 70D, would you recommend it? It’s superb image quality with your macro lens for sure
 
Eristalis pertinax.

Often attracted to my variegated laurel shrub in the garden.

hov101_1400.jpg


hov102_1400.jpg


hov104_1400.jpg


hov105a_1400.jpg


hov106_1400.jpg


hov103_1400.jpg



Paul.
 
Seathestars said:
What do you use for looking at GOT please mate. Reason I’m asking is because I always use my iPad for uploading photos with, they look fine on my iPad. I logged on here earlier on my work computer (bigger screen than iPad) and all the photos looked stretched and grainy.
I would have thought they’d be the same size regardless
Click to expand...
Honestly, 99% of the time it's just on my phone.

Hides a lot of things and most things look perfect.

I have the same if i look at the back of the camera, think I have nailed it only to be disappointed upon downloading to my computer.

A modern day version of sending your canisters off for developing I guess.
 



Welcome

Join Grand Old Team to get involved in the Everton discussion. Signing up is quick, easy, and completely free.

Register

Shop

Back
Top