ForeverBellend92 must be fuming he can't infest this thread with his nonsense.

I dont doubt that scenario tbh. It's unworkable. But the issue with what you suggest is that it'd have to go through that drawn out process instead of it being a human right for trans people to simply enjoy that liberty.Dave I'd urge you to wait for the first test case that gets to the SC where someone is discriminated against on the basis that they are trans (whether or not they have the GRC) and have been denied access to a single-sex space.
I would hazard a guess that Rowling et al will be all over the TV for the next few days slating these same judges that they currently cheer.
I find when biological women celebrate the ruling and biological men are angry/upset about it, speaks more for modern society than anything else. What an age to live in.Looks like Trumpism to me - the effect if not the means of delivering the law. Minority rights binned.
Things have very much changed for transpeople. 'Still protected' is utter nonsense when they'll be barred from certain places and organisations will seize this judgement to enforce that without fear of being checked.
Trump and Vance and the rest of the team who Starmer pays fealty to will be delighted they have so much leverage here.
GanaHmmm.
Which part of that stuck out to you as the most concerning detail?
As an aside, who was your player of the match on Saturday?
Well the 6'3, 101kg, Rhr 62bpm, cognitive genius of a 78 year old linebacker, obviously has a personal chef.that petrified fart bag (trump) doesn't even make the decisions about his daily meals. you offer him for more respect than he deserves.
Well the 6'3, 101kg, Rhr 62bpm, cognitive genius of a 78 year old linebacker, obviously has a personal chef.
Read the ruling, not the headlines.
There is some very mischievous reporting going on.
Nothing has changed.
Dave I'd urge you to wait for the first test case that gets to the SC where someone is discriminated against on the basis that they are trans (whether or not they have the GRC) and have been denied access to a single-sex space.
I would hazard a guess that Rowling et al will be all over the TV for the next few days slating these same judges that they currently cheer.