didn't vote; what we need is a nasty barsteward who can play...or maybe two
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
didn't vote; what we need is a nasty barsteward who can play...or maybe two
McCarthy and Besic i think would be the ones there. If martinez went for a real "animal" i wonder who he would go for.
Dont see many Gattuso or Jeremies types these days....they all seem a bit fancy.
Perhaps Ledson? We do seem to have a few DMs now.
got to be nastier* and play better than McCarthy...we haven't seen too much of Besic tbh.
* Not nastier in a kopite way, hard but fair. Collins, Kay etc
sad to say we need a none kopite Souness
What is a "traditional No. 10"?
Being as this silly expression has only been around for two or three years, it ain't a very long "tradition".
I always thought the 85-86 team played in the model you suggest there. More of a rigid 4-4-2 with it must be said, the perfect players to implement it. Whereas the 84-85 and to a lesser extent 86-87 teams were more total football teams where you'd see the ball winning midfielder or the centre forward crossing from the wing with the wide, creative midfielder, central defender or full back popping up in the area to score.....I think it's a really difficult call. I look at the fantastic mid-80s team and we had 2 ball winning midfielders who hunted in a pair. The creativity largely came from both flanks with 2 traditional forwards. I often think that is a really good model but it all depends on the players. Not many teams go with the luxury of 2 forwards now.
2 or 3 years? On the continent they gave their playmakers the number 10 shirt since the beginning of time.
See Zidane / Baggio /Hagi / Laudrup.
Zatara is the only poster on my ignore list, not because of the content of his posts, but his mangling of quote etiquette.
Same, but damned if you do damned if you don't.Zatara is the only poster on my ignore list, not because of the content of his posts, but his mangling of quote etiquette.
Same, but damned if you do damned if you don't.
He posts loads and starts threads so it STILL reads weird going through it.
A good all rounder.
And what is your problem with that, my good man