Christmas Pardon

[BlueLlama]

Mods in the spirit of Xmas how about a pardon for a banned poster? The people could vote for the person they would most like to have back.

 

[Pat's Van]

I'd love a "Mick's Crimbo Diary" thread off Santa this year like

even just to parody the fk out of it

 

[blue4eva77]

Because he is a monumental bellend

Which adds fun and entertainment.

 

[tommye]

Because he is a monumental bellend

tbf if all the monumental bellends were banned there would be about 10 posters left.

 

[Kurt.]

tbf if all the monumental bellends were banned there would be about 10 posters left.

And the 10 of us would miss you xx

 

[Groucho]

Joking, like.

 

[Elong]

Joking, like.

But he's already here and you guys know it x

 

[Kurt.]

He walks among us daily

 

[Elong]

He walks among us daily

I actually don't mind his latest incarnation.

 

[Woolly Blue]

He walks among us daily

 

[Elong]

A man who wants to set fire to dogs is allowed to post, but a man who likes foxes isn't

 

[Seamus Colemole]

I'll never understand the "Ban someone for breaking the forum rules but let them make a new account and carry on posting. Sometimes." policy on here really.

But it is what it is, and i'm not moaning anymore

 

[Woolly Blue]

I'll never understand the "Ban someone for breaking the forum rules but let them make a new account and carry on posting. Sometimes." policy on here really.

It's not a policy. Every case gets judged on it's merits. Most of the time people who have been previously banned get binned as soon as we're reasonably sure that the new poster is actually the old poster. Occassionally, for all sorts of reasons, someone gets given another chance. It'd be much easier for us just to have a zero tolerance policy and would save a fair amount of time in mod central.

... and i'm not moaning anymore

I can only speak for myself, but I hope this isn't true. As moaners go you're fairly constructive and balanced






You're mostly wrong though

xxx

 

[Kurt.]

It's not a policy. Every case gets judged on it's merits. Most of the time people who have been previously banned get binned as soon as we're reasonably sure that the new poster is actually the old poster. Occassionally, for all sorts of reasons, someone gets given another chance. It'd be much easier for us just to have a zero tolerance policy and would save a fair amount of time in mod central.



I can only speak for myself, but I hope this isn't true. As moaners go you're fairly constructive and balanced






You're mostly wrong though

xxx

When you say balanced.... You mean he dribbles from both corners of his mouth at the same time surely ?

 

[Seamus Colemole]

It's not a policy. Every case gets judged on it's merits. Most of the time people who have been previously banned get binned as soon as we're reasonably sure that the new poster is actually the old poster. Occassionally, for all sorts of reasons, someone gets given another chance. It'd be much easier for us just to have a zero tolerance policy and would save a fair amount of time in mod central.



I can only speak for myself, but I hope this isn't true. As moaners go you're fairly constructive and balanced






You're mostly wrong though

xxx

Which is fair enough.

Of course there's pretty much 2 very strange exceptions really which will never make sense why they're still allowed to post.

Maybe one day when i'm a mod i'll figure it out

 

[Woolly Blue]

Which is fair enough.

Of course there's pretty much 2 very strange exceptions really which will never make sense why they're still allowed to post.

Maybe one day when i'm a mod i'll figure it out

Sometimes we talk about things in great depth
Other times we use a decision making aid