Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Reminds me of when @Barry Rathbone left in a strop as his ideas on climate change were challenged by people who had direct knowledge of what they were talking about.
What are you on about?What influence?
You then go on to admit that they are reliant on the foundation’s money, with them being the second biggest donor behind the good old U.S of A. His money couldn’t buy him any influence at all could it? I mean, what influence? lol
I can’t be arsed with this thread anymore.
Yeah, critique and discussion about different conspiracies should be welcomed, but it’s been hijacked by a load of smart arses that want to do nothing but pretend that there’s never been a conspiracy. Not one. The mainstream narrative must be believed because the BBC don’t tell lies.
If it’s a thread where people think being the WHO’s second biggest funder to the tune of over 50 billion pound doesn’t come with any influence, then I think I’ll leave it here. You can’t discuss conspiracy theories properly if people are going to be so naive that handing over 50 billion dollars wouldn’t afford the donor any influence whatsoever.
It’s like arguing Usmanov or Phil Green would have no influence over Everton even if they’re the ones bankrolling them or keeping them in business. They’re doing what most chairman should be doing, but that doesn’t mean they have any influence
For what it’s worth, here’s an article quoting a load of scientists that have expressed concerns about the Gates’ funding of the WHO, their love of intellectual property rights, and their focus on technology:
The media loves the Gates Foundation. These experts are more skeptical.
Vox is a general interest news site for the 21st century. Its mission: to help everyone understand our complicated world, so that we can all help shape it. In text, video and audio, our reporters explain politics, policy, world affairs, technology, culture, science, the climate crisis, money...www.google.co.uk
I’m leaving it there, though. There are other places on the internet where conspiracy theories can be discussed properly, without conversing with people that become agitated when anything but the media narrative is accepted.
That’s a good one. I always wonder if builders always reveal when they find unknown structures or remains when building a new property etc as they know it will cause a massive hold up with archaeologists coming to inspect and detail everything. I suspect not
Builders here in Spain are gutted when they turn up an old Roman house. The Government give six months for the University to dig.
I’ve seen spanish builders at work. Usually 3 lads, one doing some half hearted graft whilst the other 2 watch smoking endless tabs.
They have all the health and safety posters up and wear shorts, training shoes and never a helmet in sight.
“Conspiracy theories rely on two things. One, there is actual proof of conspiracies having taken place in the past, conspiracies aren’t the same as magic. And two, something which can until now only be a theory, as the truth is unknown.”
A good conspiracy theory is simply based on two things
