Conspiracy theories

[Lord Buckethead]

how would you have done it?

Drowned in Muslim Semen.

It's what she would have wanted.

 

[gonetomorrow]

The whole Diana thing is most undignified. The Princes should not have allowed themselves to get drawn into the whole business form the start.

 

[a bell maul]

Landmine.

That would have been her told.

I think you're underestimating the nous of your garden variety royalist. They would have picked up on the irony of this in....





....yeah, good idea

 

[Lord Buckethead]

The whole Diana thing is most undignified. The Princes should not have allowed themselves to get drawn into the whole business form the start.

It's their easy in for publicity and public sympathy so the public doesn't string them up (or take back the vast wealth you humans have given them) when Lizzie dies.
It must be kind of difficult for you mere mortals to relate to Billionaires who don't pay any tax, living at your expense in a different Castle every few months surrounded by priceless works of art that you nominally own.

 

[Alan Whittle]

pretty sure it was a bullet...

Well, certainly one of the bullets. There remains doubt as to how many shots were fired and from which direction they came.

 

[degsy]

A year after this interview, Charles and Diana divorced each other, thus ending any hopes that anyone had of Diana becoming our Queen.

If the establishment murdered her they didn't do it to stop her from becoming Queen.

4 people in the car
1 wearing his seat belt survived
3 didn't > death by laziness and/or stupidity
#Occam.

 

[degsy]

Well, certainly one of the bullets. There remains doubt as to how many shots were fired and from which direction they came.

yep, the old magic bullet thingy
tbh, it's not the who singular or plural or bullets, magic or otherwise, but the why and on whose say so.
plenty of wheels within wheels on this.
It's the ultimate cold case now.

 

[gorgeousgeorgeEFC]

She would never have been Queen in the same way Prince Phillip (not a British Prince) isn't King.

The reason she was 'removed with extreme prejudice' was she'd been shagging anything that moved for years (hence Prince Harry) and was then pregnant by the Muslim son of Mohamed al Fayed whom the Government and Royal family utterly despised. She refused to disappear abroad and regularly used her popularity in the flag waving nutter press to embarrass to the Government (Landmines) and Royal Family (accusations of domestic abuse aimed at the heir to the throne).

If the baby had gone ahead the Palace would have had to have a policy on it. There was no way they were going to be able to condone a Muslim half brother to William (and legitimise al Fayed (they only just got away with keeping Harry in house because it meant there technically was a spare despite the marriage being over in any meaningful sense), and they didn't wouldn't want take the massive publicity hit of publicly working against the son of the extremely popular ex wife of the Heir to the Throne.

Yes, Diana could only ever have been a Queen consort like the current Queen's mother was when King George VI was on the throne; she could never have been our actual Head of State.

Putting that aside: why would the establishment despise the idea of Mohamed Al-Fayed's son fathering a half-brother of Princes William and Harry?

The Queen and Charles, for all their faults, do not strike me as racist or Islamophobic. Indeed, Charles regularly visits Mosques as part of his interfaith work and the Queen recently had a Muslim prayer room built at Buckingham Palace.

 

[Alan Whittle]

yep, the old magic bullet thingy
tbh, it's not the who singular or plural or bullets, magic or otherwise, but the why and on whose say so.
plenty of wheels within wheels on this.
It's the ultimate cold case now.

Agreed. But in order to do that you start with what you've got. Gormless forensic work and a botched autopsy finished the chances of a clear investigation before it started.

 

[JimmyJeffers]

Yes, Diana could only ever have been a Queen consort like the current Queen's mother was when King George VI was on the throne; she could never have been our actual Head of State.

Putting that aside: why would the establishment despise the idea of Mohamed Al-Fayed's son fathering a half-brother of Princes William and Harry?

The Queen and Charles, for all their faults, do not strike me as racist or Islamophobic. Indeed, Charles regularly visits Mosques as part of his interfaith work and the Queen recently had a Muslim prayer room built at Buckingham Palace.

Sssssh mate. It's just lazy assumptions to fit a half-baked narrative.

 

[canuckblue]

Watched yet another documentary about this a couple of months back, which did conclude that LHO did shoot JFK, but they also theorized that a second shot that hit the president was fired accidentally by a secret service agent from the car following JFK's. what they said apparently happened was that when the agent heard the first shot he reached for an assault rifle that he had in the car the rifle had the safety off and a bullet in the chamber the gun went off hitting the president, this they reckon is why there was a massive cover up by the secret service watching the program it all seemed plausible, to be fair it was one of the better documentaries about the shooting. But who knows it's all a mystery.

The fact Kennedy's head went backward -- with the back of his head blown out -- indicates a headshot from the front. Oswald may have fired at him, but he didn't make the fatal shot. Add to that the Warren Commission's "magic bullet" theory that required a bullet to change trajectory almost at right angles in mid-air so as to hit both Kennedy and Connally and it's as clear as the nose on Phil Thompson's face there was at least one more shooter. Those behind the assassination couldn't possibly have wanted to put all their eggs in Oswald's basket.

 

[Alan Whittle]

The fact Kennedy's head went backward -- with the back of his head blown out -- indicates a headshot from the front. Oswald may have fired at him, but he didn't make the fatal shot. Add to that the Warren Commission's "magic bullet" theory that required a bullet to change trajectory almost at right angles in mid-air so as to hit both Kennedy and Connally and it's as clear as the nose on Phil Thompson's face there was at least one more shooter. Those behind the assassination couldn't possibly have wanted to put all their eggs in Oswald's basket.

...and he may not. There is no conclusive evidence that he was the actual shooter from the School book depository.

 

[canuckblue]

...and he may not. There is no conclusive evidence that he was the actual shooter from the School book depository.

Exactly. I've read several items that said his rifle was so out of alignment, he couldn't hit the broad side of a barn from the inside. Definitely set up to take the fall. Even the picture with him holding the rifle is said to have been doctored -- shadows pointing in different directions.

 

[Groucho]

Drowned in Muslim Semen.

It's what she would have wanted.

Easy mate there's people having their tea here.

 

[Thomasc]

The most obvious hole in 9/11 was the so called plane that drove through the doors of The Pentagon!

By a pilot that had apparently never driven a commercial airliner before, who performed a maneuver so difficult according to airline pilots with hundreds of hours flying time that they would even find in difficult.

Obviously the lack of footage as well, no shots ever shown of a plane going into the building, the hole in the Pentagon being nothing like it should have been if such an occurrence had taken place and of course no wreckage ever shown.