Crypto currency (IF banned from CA)

[JimmyJeffers]

Richard Heart, the guy you all called a scammer just raised 27 million for a longevity research charity, truly the act of a scammer.

People don’t talk enough about Jimmy Saville’s charity work

 

[DuuuncanHadaPigeon]

People don’t talk enough about Jimmy Saville’s charity work

Your logic is retarded, I suggest you research syllogistic inference.

You really don't know what you are talking about so you just make random nonce jokes. You aren't as funny as you think.

 

[The binman chronicles]

Just crash already. It's getting boring. I like boom and bust.

 

[JimmyJeffers]

Your logic is retarded, I suggest you research syllogistic inference.

You really don't know what you are talking about so you just make random nonce jokes. You aren't as funny as you think.

A) it’s not. He raised a lot of money for charities whilst being a thoroughly horrible person with a sinister agenda. I’m not saying your boy Heart is a disgusting paedo but him raising money for charity is no definite indicator of him being a ‘good
person’

b) that term is widely (and rightly) admonished on these pages and gives more of a reveal into the kind of person you are.

c)I have a very high reaction to post ratio, proving that I am very funny to be honest.

 

[JimmyJeffers]

I suggest you research syllogistic inference.

Still lolling at this

 

[DuuuncanHadaPigeon]

A) it’s not. He raised a lot of money for charities whilst being a thoroughly horrible person with a sinister agenda. I’m not saying your boy Heart is a disgusting paedo but him raising money for charity is no definite indicator of him being a ‘good
person’

b) that term is widely (and rightly) admonished on these pages and gives more of a reveal into the kind of person you are.

c)I have a very high reaction to post ratio, proving that I am very funny to be honest.

A) you inferred a bad person raised money for charity therefore anyone who raises money for charity is a bad person. Bad logic

B) you are right, it's the wrong term to use.

C) no one cares about your internet points, you can pat yourself on your back all you want.

Like I said you have no idea about crypto. You cannot refute this.

 

[JimmyJeffers]

A) you inferred a bad person raised money for charity therefore anyone who raises money for charity is a bad person. Bad logic

B) you are right, it's the wrong term to use.

C) no one cares about your internet points, you can pat yourself on your back all you want.

Like I said you have no idea about crypto. You cannot refute this.

No mate. You inferred he was a good person cos he raises money for charity. I merely pointed to a VERY obvious example of how that is not necessarily a very good indicator.
Not sure how you’re finding this so difficult to understand to be honest.

 

[Jimishorts]

C) no one cares about your internet points

They could be worth a lot when the boss launches GOTcoin.

 

[Toast]

People don’t talk enough about Jimmy Saville’s charity work

His death thread on here disappeared.
I’d love to read that back again.
That was before everyone knew he was a predator, but a few here did..

 

[Daveysgingerlovechild]

They could be worth a lot when the boss launches GOTcoin.

GOTcoin!

I think he'll do it once he's boned up on syllogistic inference, totemic reference, myocardial regression, and bean counting.

 

[DuuuncanHadaPigeon]

No mate. You inferred he was a good person cos he raises money for charity. I merely pointed to a VERY obvious example of how that is not necessarily a very good indicator.
Not sure how you’re finding this so difficult to understand to be honest

I don't think it's an unreasonable position to take that a person who raises a substantial amount of money for charity is a good person, maybe I'm the crazy one for thinking that.

I might be wrong about Richard Heart, but one thing I'm not wrong about is you being utterly clueless about crypto.

Congratulations on your internet points, you are the envy of many people.

 

[Death]

Your logic is retarded, I suggest you research syllogistic inference.

You really don't know what you are talking about so you just make random nonce jokes. You aren't as funny as you think.

You're having something alright. And its not a pigeon.

 

[JimmyJeffers]

I don't think it's an unreasonable position to take that a person who raises a substantial amount of money for charity is a good person, maybe I'm the crazy one for thinking that.

I might be wrong about Richard Heart, but one thing I'm not wrong about is you being utterly clueless about crypto.

Congratulations on your internet points, you are the envy of many people.

Bloody hell man. I’m not sure if I can make this easier for you to understand. Richard Heart has been accused in various quarters, as being a scammer. You said
‘the guy you all called a scammer just raised 27 million for a longevity research charity, truly the act of a scammer.’
I say something along the lines of that doesn’t prove he’s not a scammer and use the example of Jimmy saville as a person who did things for charity but was (at least in my view) a bad man.
I don’t understand why you’re getting so upset. Just admit you were wrong and we can get back to discussing Thai sex dungeons.

 

[PhilM]

@JimmyJeffers did you mention Jimmy Saville as an apt link to the questionable use of crypto-currencies to fund commercial sexual exploitation of children?

 

[JimmyJeffers]

@JimmyJeffers did you mention Jimmy Saville as an apt link to the questionable use of crypto-currencies to fund commercial sexual exploitation of children?

It was just the first person that came to mind to be honest but seems pretty appropriate in retrospect