Crypto currency (IF banned from CA)

PhilM said:
I thought the standard of proof for this thread is you don’t need proof: you offer a rebuttal without an answer, ignore genuine enquiries and call people sheep and luddites.
Click to expand...
i just wanted a bit more info on how im aiding modern slavery,
but you are right,maybe the request was too much to ask!
 

DuuuncanHadaPigeon said:
So Richard Heart literally warns people about a specific project that can be exploited, that project then gets exploited for 610million but somehow he is the bad guy in this situation?

Like I've said before you are literally cluessless about this subject.

I'm happy for you to prove me wrong
Click to expand...
I’m not sure how you can say I’m clueless here to be honest. Let’s run through this again. I’ve made it a bit simpler this time.

You say: Richard Heart made money for charity therefore proving he’s not a scammer.
I say: That’s nonsense. Plenty of horrible people have made money for charity and indeed have used it as a smokescreen to be able to commit abhorrent acts(eg. Jimmy Saville)
You get all weirdly defensive and say: you clearly don’t know what you’re talking about and use a deplorable term.
I say: I mean, what I said is valid though and you shouldn’t use that language.
You say: you don’t know what you’re talking about (again)

Going round in circles here. Like having an argument with very basic robot.
I suggest you to study: ‘reading a book’ or ‘going outside’
 
JimmyJeffers said:
I’m not sure how you can say I’m clueless here to be honest. Let’s run through this again. I’ve made it a bit simpler this time.

You say: Richard Heart made money for charity therefore proving he’s not a scammer.
I say: That’s nonsense. Plenty of horrible people have made money for charity and indeed have used it as a smokescreen to be able to commit abhorrent acts(eg. Jimmy Saville)
You get all weirdly defensive and say: you clearly don’t know what you’re talking about and use a deplorable term.
I say: I mean, what I said is valid though and you shouldn’t use that language.
You say: you don’t know what you’re talking about (again)

Going round in circles here. Like having an argument with very basic robot.
I suggest you to study: ‘reading a book’ or ‘going outside’
Click to expand...
Yes let's not keep going in circles regarding the charity aspect, though I did agree with you about the use of my language.


When I say you are clueless, I mean with respect to cryptocurrency, which you have shown you know little about, happy for you to prove me wrong.
 



Welcome

Join Grand Old Team to get involved in the Everton discussion. Signing up is quick, easy, and completely free.

Register

Shop

Back
Top