It was just something to think about Ev. It does not mean that because the present system has been around for some time that there is not room for thinking of improvement. I also agree with Ichigo about bringing IT into the game. But that would not have made any difference at Newcastle where the linesman was clearly thinking of last night's S**G. That fellow cost us at least 1 point if not all 3.
I was not saying that your idea was a bad one Robert, just that i think the point system is ok as it is.
What you are suggesting as a talking point is that the away side get all three points if the game ends in a score draw.
Two scenarios ~
1) The HOME side are winning 3-0 at half time, the away team score three in the second half, you could argue that as the away side they deserve to collect all three points.
2) The AWAY team is 3 up at the interval, the home side come out for the second half all guns blazing, breathtaking football etc.........., they get back to 3-3 and dont get anything for their efforts, what a sickener that would be, they would have needed to score four to get three points.
My argument is that any side that manages to claw their way back from a 3-0 defecit deserve a share of the spoils irrespective of if they are the home or away side.
I dont even agree with goal-line gizmos, to my mind it would steralize the game, make it clinical and robotic as a spectacle.
The ' Beautifull Game ' is beautifull the way it is, and the reason for that is that ' human error ' is still involved, give me the controversies, injustice and talking points any day of the week, some decisions go for you some go against, over the course of a season they even themselves out.
Hi-Tech means the end of the game as we know and love it now, just imagine no more ' we wuz robbed ', Unthinkable!
Give me a ' specsaver ' ref any day of the week, makes footy and life in general more exciting.
COYB