But selling our other main striker would have just left us needing to replace two goalscorers rather than one mate.In normal circumstances mate no I wouldn't want to sell them
But when one has to go it should have been the one with massive concerns about his durability.
Obviously Richy was going so it's not a case of us choosing which went
Then with the funds from that sale nit effectively bring available to replace.
The question is how do you replace those goals whilst having the real possibility/probability that your only other goalscorer could also easily go down.
Answer is sell him and use those funds to do so / or attempt to do something.
As it is now we have the real possibility of having no cf at the club. Because we crossed our fingers and hoped something fragile wouldn't break.
For the worth he had he was worth more to sell to reinvest then to keep and hope
So say we had £50m extra to spend, but we'd have to spend that on two players who we'd hoped would be sure-fire guarantees of 10-15 goals each a season, and ones that would want to play for us without paying stupid wages?