How is leaking team news five mins before the club a detriment? Same with transfers, every club, literally every one, has people that get scoops on potential targets, that’s just how football is these days. Before the age of social media that stuff was put on pay to hear phone linesNo, what's sad is some attention seeker leaking team news + transfer info to the detriment of the club, and charging for it.
How? The media hasn't gotten anything out the club that they didn't want out there for years now. All we'd have got is Lampard at his press conference saying DCL wasn't available for Chelsea but surely not elaborating much.Still weird. It's going to come out sooner or later. Papers will probably pick it up today or tomorrow anyway.
I agree 100% with him. I said the other the day that the d-head should be more responsible about what he leaks out, if he does geniunely get real secret info (which I do doubt), because it can put the club squarely a back foot. He came out of the woodwork and proceeded to tell me what a top fella he was, about how he sorted about 20 people out for tickets and he just passes along infornation to fellow blues, yardy yardy yada. If DCL is out for a pro-longed period and everybody now knows it clubs are going to have us over a barrel because we'll now be more desperate than ever for a striker.
He's probably lurking in here like the insecure bell he is, along with his cultist, weirdo disciples. (Four-letter word)
We can't win games with oneMan City have won League titles without a striker.
What injury does he have now? Do you know?
Or are you pulling things out of your arse since you have as much info as the rest of us?
Worse: he's a fraud who makes everything up, but is leaking classified blues news online!Has he leaked that your partner is leaving you or something?
But you have to have someone willing to pay £50m - nobody was, at least not at the start of the summer.Without the 50m using that analogy you are left with nothing to replace 10-15 goals mate and hoping the 50m asset doesn't break down.
So if it's bad we have zero money to replace 20-30 goals in the situ.
Which option is more risk in reality given the extent of the DCL injury last season.
Mad that the Everton injury list will leak DCL’s injury to the entire world!!!!!!
I don't think anybody made that bid though mate.
But who buys a player that is injured mate?I thought it would have been a risk to also sell DCL but I didnt have the medical information available. If there were concerns about his fitness he should have been made available for sale.
Having a consistently injured centre forward as your only hope for a decent season is a lot riskier than selling that player and reinvesting in 1 or 2 replacements.
This is not bad luck. I keep reading that but its not true. To be one single injury away from a crisis that could easily result in relegation is absolutely pathetic and the hierarchy of the club deserve not one single excuse. The running of the club continues to be utterly shambolic.
Why would anyone want to manage this club? The people above you will give you no help whatsoever
Chelsea will be buzzing we've gone from being really crap to really, really crapStill think it’s proper hilarious that people think a team’s entire match preparation goes out the window when they hear one of our players is injured.
Chelsea will be buzzing we've gone from being really crap to really, really crap
And therein lies the problem, the world and his uncle may well now be getting the message he’s got issues when it comes to keeping himself fit enough for anyone else to invest big money in him!Get cornet and Dennis and flog DCL when fit, to get the money back. He's becoming a liability.