Donald Trump for President Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
You cling to that information that Trump couldnt even appoint that special attorney? Did I understand you right? That wasnt the point. Point was that some see the wrong in the fact that Clinton doesnt have to take responsibility out of anything she has done.
What do you actually think about these emails? What do you actually think about the fact that they(Clinton and her staff + FBI ))- please watch Congressional hearings where FBI director is questioned) destroyed amazing amounts of evidence? Simple question.

Wow, it's back to these emails again. That's all Trump has, and the vote is rigged.

Crazy man.
 

I really don't get the big deal with the email situation. Mountain out of a molehill isn't it?

Director of FBI said they were deleted before suponea.

But, some people would rather believe a man who has consistently lied throughout his campaign about practically everything and is now saying the vote is rigged.

I wonder if Trump posts on RAWK? He definitely has them traits.
 
None of this detracts from the fact that neither candidate is suitable, and that the US is continuing down the poopy creek w/o a paddle.
Not that our offerings are superior in any way.
Director of FBI said they were deleted before suponea.

But, some people would rather believe a man who has consistently lied throughout his campaign about practically everything and is now saying the vote is rigged.

I wonder if Trump posts on RAWK? He definitely has them traits.
 
None of this detracts from the fact that neither candidate is suitable, and that the US is continuing down the poopy creek w/o a paddle.
Not that our offerings are superior in any way.

True, personally I would have liked Sanders. He probably could have beat Hilary if he brought up the email issue and pushed it but he tried to win on policy and fair tactics.
 

True, personally I would have liked Sanders. He probably could have beat Hilary if he brought up the email issue and pushed it but he tried to win on policy and fair tactics.

For me Sanders is in much the same camp as Trump, albeit he's infinitely more likeable. The reason I lump them (and to a large extent Corbyn) together is that they can largely attribute their popularity to proposing schemes that sound great but are largely unworkable. It's an old adage that it's best to under-promise and over-deliver, but populist politicians are the exact opposite, as we've seen with the likes of Syriza and the mess we're in with Brexit at the moment, where most of the promises that got them where they are, are unlikely to be kept.

I'd much rather a politician who was honest with the electorate and ensured pledges had at least some attachment to reality, even if that makes them less grandiose and tub thumping.
 
For me Sanders is in much the same camp as Trump, albeit he's infinitely more likeable. The reason I lump them (and to a large extent Corbyn) together is that they can largely attribute their popularity to proposing schemes that sound great but are largely unworkable. It's an old adage that it's best to under-promise and over-deliver, but populist politicians are the exact opposite, as we've seen with the likes of Syriza and the mess we're in with Brexit at the moment, where most of the promises that got them where they are, are unlikely to be kept.

I'd much rather a politician who was honest with the electorate and ensured pledges had at least some attachment to reality, even if that makes them less grandiose and tub thumping.
So which of them are truthful?
 
Look they are both terrible terrible candidates. Well every four years they are. But that's the system its not thier fault. If you were to pick the best of two evils it has to be Trump. Clinton is responsible for a lot that goes down in the middle east being secretary of state. She is responsible for countless civilian life's and is horny for conflict with Russia. It's an absolute no brainer. Trump says a bunch of dumb [Poor language removed] like bombing terrorists but he's an idiot that doesn't know what he is doing. And even that's a safer bet than the calculated Hillary. And not that they'd let trump do what he wants either.
 
Last edited:

Look they are both terrible terrible candidates. Well every four years they are. But that's the system its not thier fault. If you were to pick the best of two evils it has to be Trump. Clinton is responsible for a lot that goes down in the middle east being secretary of state. She is responsible for countless civilian life's and is horny for conflict with Russia. It's an absolute no brainer. Trump says a bunch of dumb [Poor language removed] like bombing terrorists but he's an idiot that doesn't know what he is doing. And even that's a safer bet than the calculated Hillary. And not that they'd let trump do what he wants either.

Mate?

So essentially you believe Hillary Clinton is a calculated murderer and that an idiot who doesn't know what he's doing should run the United States of America.

To be fair mate, the only no brainer here is you.
 
I see Assanges internet priviledges has been restricted. You couldnt make this up.
Like from some movie where opposite opinions and voices are supressed.
 
I see Assanges internet priviledges has been restricted. You couldnt make this up.
Like from some movie where opposite opinions and voices are supressed.

So Ecuador who have totally ignored America with regards to Assange so far by housing him for so long have suddenly decided to become a part of the "mainstream media conspiracy" against Trump have they.
 

Status
Not open for further replies.

Welcome

Join Grand Old Team to get involved in the Everton discussion. Signing up is quick, easy, and completely free.

Shop

Back
Top