dyche thinks

[Goat]

Even @MikeH72 would agree that last season was a great effort.

I wouldnt.

He created a relegation battle, in which his fanboys claimed was a miracle to escape.

He didnt take over mid season from a failing manager, he WAS the failing manager.

 

[Neiler]

Even @MikeH72 would agree that last season was a great effort.

The issue is this season. We were awful and in real danger, at the time, of going down. BTW, the point a game that he has achieved over his career counts for nothing. The Premier League relegate teams based on points earned in a given season not on the manager's average over his career.

At his time of sacking he was on for 33 pts based on ppg, personally i think we prob would reverted to his mean or just above a point - think we would have finished on something like 36+.

I think there prob would have been an increased sense of jeopardy for sure, but i didn't really ever feel wed go down this season or would be of risk of it personally.

Yeah no complaints on this season really mate, I'm on record as saying he failed the audition this season from just a purely management point of view. But i think it was the context, that forced the hand really - i think his position was untenable after the takeover and events following.

 

[RomanReigns]

How dare you all disrespect our 19th greatest record manager of all time

 

[Saint Domingo]

I wouldnt.

He created a relegation battle, in which his fanboys claimed was a miracle to escape.

He didnt take over mid season from a failing manager, he WAS the failing manager.

And my post was insane. Lol.

 

[GrandOldSte117]

This really.

It’s basically one side of ‘Dychettes’ acknowledging when It was good, and when it was bad, and then another side of absolute loonies saying all of it was bad regardless of circumstance and ginger whiff etc

 

[twoblue]

The intellects V bedwetters.

This will never die… been fun revisiting. Checking out before my head explodes

 

[Goat]

And my post was insane. Lol.

My post is based on facts.

You went on a rant about poker chips or something, I didnt really read it tbh.

 

[twoblue]

It’s basically one side of ‘Dychettes’ acknowledging when It was good, and when it was bad, and then another side of absolute loonies saying all of it was bad regardless of circumstance and ginger whiff etc

And thatcher, and selco…

Ironically i imagine a lot of the anti -dyche to have snot stained sleeves…

 

[GrandOldSte117]

My post is based on facts.

You went on a rant about poker chips or something, I didnt really read it tbh.

It ruins your point when you say ‘based on facts’ when it’s a subjective situation depending on your viewpoint

 

[Saint Domingo]

My post is based on facts.

You went on a rant about poker chips or something, I didnt really read it tbh.

Lol

 

[Goat]

It ruins your point when you say ‘based on facts’ when it’s a subjective situation depending on your viewpoint

No mate, its a fact that Dyche was managing us when we were actively engaged in a relegation battle.

Do you disagree with that statement?

 

[Goat]

Lol

Poker chips.

 

[Neiler]

It ruins your point when you say ‘based on facts’ when it’s a subjective situation depending on your viewpoint

Now you’ve done it, you’ve used big words.

That’s 70% of the attendance of this thread wiped out.

*Anyway getting back to snot.

 

[Goat]

Now you’ve done it, you’ve used big words.

That’s 70% of the attendance of this thread wiped out.

*Anyway getting back to snot.

Mate yesterday you spelt the word Dyche wrong.

 

[davek]

"Dychettes" though.

You know you've lost when you start using that.