The
High altitude football controversy arose in May 2007 when
FIFA introduced a ban on international matches at more than 2,750 metres above sea level, citing concerns about players' health and the "unfair" advantage to acclimatised home teams. The ruling meant that
Bolivia,
Ecuador and
Colombia would be prevented from hosting
FIFA World Cup qualifiers in their own capital cities, as well as preventing a number of leading club teams in Bolivia, Ecuador, Colombia, Peru, Chile and Mexico from playing in their own stadia.
The ruling followed complaints by the
Brazilian Football Confederation that
La Paz and other
Andean venues left visiting players gasping for breath and with pounding
hearts. Brazilian club
Flamengo had vowed to boycott high-altitude games after several of their players resorted to using bottled oxygen during a
Copa Libertadores fixture against
Real Potosí of
Bolivia, held in rainy conditions at an altitude of 4,000 metres.
[2] Following this complaint a number of other Brazilian clubs declared that they would not play Copa Libertadores games at high altitude and put pressure on the
Brazilian Football Confederation and
FIFA to impose a ban on football at high altitude.
The ruling requiring players to arrive at the host city a week before international games above 8,200 feet (2,500 meters), and two weeks for matches higher than 9,800 feet (3,000 meters), to allow time to adjust to the thin air.
All of the football associations in South America except Brazil stated that they would ignore the ban on high altitude football, and play fixtures in the stadium of their hosts choice whether or not they had the opportunity to acclimatise for a week.
In June 2007
FIFA raised the limit from 2,500m to 3,000m, meaning that the only capital city effected by the ban would be
La Paz.
High altitude football controversy - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia