Apparently Sturridge has been charged with passing information which would not normally be available to the general public
Which club he was at at the time seems absolutely irrelevant to me.
This could be anything about players, team line ups, tactics plus a whole plethora of other similar stuff
Liverpool in their statement have said he's fully cooperating and hasn't betted on football
So firstly the charge doesn't even include him betting and so that 'defence' seems completely bizzare and irrelevant and secondly would anyone really think they wouldn't at least answer the questions put to them and so on the surface cooperate when perhaps his whole career could well be at stake?
Just a bland holding statement meaning absolutely nothing imo
if his answers are credible or not is something completely different.
The FA usually charge someone when they are certain of winning anyway.
José getting off with his FA charge of swearing in Portuguese was such an exception they're still in shock and hence ludicrously appealed it
In a relatively recent betting related case Joey Barton was handed an eighteen month ban.
(Way back in 1964, our own player Tony Kay was banned for life although his charge was extremely serious and part of a betting ring - on google)