ECHO Comment: "Fears of Witch-hunt Against Liverpool FC" part 3

[davek]

They dont look like they'll be fully opening that new monstrosity of theirs for a while.

 

[stony]

Here we go

Endo can be a success at Liverpool – and a better buy than Caicedo | John Duerden

Midfielder was dominant in his position in Bundesliga and captains Japan but Asian players rarely get the credit they deserve

www.theguardian.com

It's amazing how every one of their players is better, or at the least, has the potential to be better than ours, I suppose that's why they have dominated the Prem and shared the last 6 Prem titles with us.

 

[Nymzee]

 

[Alanbileysfeathercut]

They dont look like they'll be fully opening that new monstrosity of theirs for a while.

Dodgy loft conversion....

 

[davek]

Dodgy loft conversion....

They employed a company on its knees who were paying their workers rubbish wages...until they weren't even paying thrm that.

A club formed by Tories with a Tory mentality.

 

[longers]

Id rather they keep Salah, they will get a stupid fee and huge wages off their books to reinvest.

 

[Tin-Tin]

Id rather they keep Salah, they will get a stupid fee and huge wages off their books to reinvest.

Exactly.

 

[marsh]

Id rather they keep Salah, they will get a stupid fee and huge wages off their books to reinvest.

Difficult one as i think he's their best player. Salah leaving after our window shuts would be good haha

 

[Pilks]

TalkSport were blabbering about this Salah thing tonight, with guest 'ex Liverpool player' Jermaine Pennant (never realised he was a one-club man, or at least that's how it sounded!)

They were talking blithely about whether they should sell for 200 million - ffs, even to that crazy league, the man is over 30! Pennant was especially idiotic, saying they shouldn't sell even at that price as 'he's under contract, and they could sell him next year and still get the same money'. I mean he's a decent player and all, but the evidence is he's past his best already, and by imagining his value wouldn't drop once he turned 32 indicates Pennant is as deluded as the rest of the cult...

 

[the golden visionary]

TalkSport were blabbering about this Salah thing tonight, with guest 'ex stokey and only fans gimp, who played for liverpool for a season of 2 mainly off the bench' Jermaine Pennant (never realised he was a simp for his bird)

They were talking blithely about whether they should sell for 200 million - ffs, even to that crazy league, the man is over 30! Pennant was especially idiotic, saying they shouldn't sell even at that price as 'he's under contract, and they could sell him next year and still get the same money'. I mean he's a decent player and all, but the evidence is he's past his best already, and by imagining his value wouldn't drop once he turned 32 indicates Pennant is as deluded as the rest of the cult...

Fixed that for you mate

 

[Azza]

Good job they haven't just spent £70m on a midfielder or £80m on a striker last season

 

[Nymzee]

I'm sure he'd have no issue if ours went on longer than others.

 

[mahermi1]

Id rather they keep Salah, they will get a stupid fee and huge wages off their books to reinvest.

Exactly but knowing them they will get a ridiculous fee similar to Coutinho one that will set them up for another 5 years. Rather they keep an ageing Salah who relies on pace.

 

[Ivo]

I'm sure he'd have no issue if ours went on longer than others.

I sort of agree with him, but at the end of the day if you have a player under contract you don't have to sell him.

 

[GoldenToffee]

Not gonna say he's massively on the decline as he's still about five times better than any player we've had in 30 years, but it would be proper typical for Liverpool to have been able to enjoy a truly world class Salah for 5 years and then still be able to sell him for over £100m when he's on a downwards curve at 31 years old. They may very well have ended up getting £150-170m for Salah, Fabinho and Henderson.