• Participation within this subforum is only available to members who have had 5+ posts approved elsewhere.

ECHO Comment: "Fears of Witch-hunt Against Liverpool FC" part 3

JelavicBrate2 said:
Believe what you want to believe, if you believe that Klopp is simply this amazing manager, who can ensure that they can compete with a small squad in multiple competitions, when other top clubs rest players or get injuries all season then fine. So United's side of 08/09. VDS or foster in goal. Evra, Vidic, Ferdinand, O Shea, Evans Neville in defence. Ronaldo, Giggs, Nani, Anderson, Fletcher, Carrick, Scholes in midfield. Rooney, Berbatov, Tevez and Welbeck up front. They were far better across the pitch, than any of Klopps sides. Take a look at Chelseas teams, Arsenals teams and City's team that won titles, packed to the brim with quality,chad strength in depth. Players who left went on to decent careers at other clubs. Yet not one of Klopps rejects has done anything elsewhere after leaving. Macherano, Alonso, Suarez, or Sterling didn't become bad players after leaving Anfield. Yes the fact that Rooney, Torres, Tevez, RVP, Eto, Owen, Fowler, Lukaku, Aguero Villa and Messi were all playing at a top level from an early age at big clubs. Yet as has been pointed out nobody noticed Salah. If something doesn't make sense it generally isn't true. Milner was an alright midfielder in his prime, he has somehow after an incredibly average City side got rid of him, played constantly in a Liverpool side that play higher intensity football all as he's coming the end of his career. Of course it makes perfect sense that it's just Ribena, that's helped him keep up.



It's not like people cover up the wrong doings of Liverpool FC and their fans. That would never happen, Heysel was caused by Chelsea fans. Despite the fact that Liverpool fans robbed their fans in Athens and tried to bunk in then. They did it it Madrid, their highly witty supporters have continually boasted about it, it was actually all local Arabs, who only tried to bunk in the Liverpool end. Rascals given Liberpool a bad reputation. When Suarez repeatedly called Evra the N word, while in a argument it was actually a term of endearment, shame on Evra for bringing Liberpool bad publicity. See Liberpool are an honest club they first denied he said it and made a big song and dance over Evra lying, then when Suarez admitted to it changed the script and said it was cultural. Yet all the RS players involved other than when Evra challenged spitty, have got away with it. Its not like Liverpool would cover up one of their players beating up a DJ, or miraculously fail to catch anyone attacking City's coach.

Look at the reaction to Neville simply pointing out the atmosphere was poor at Anfield v United. He was criticized in the Echo and his comments somehow were compared to people mocking Hillsborough. When has anyone on here or anywhere else made a huge deal about a pundit saying the atmosphere happened to be poor at GP at a particular game warranted such a response. Look at the reaction to Pickfords challenge, somehow on here said it was mentioned recently while they we watching a non league game with no relevance to Liverpool. The idea that anyone in the media or the authorities would investigate Liberpool for any wrong doing is ridiculous. Pointing out a blatant fact such as the atmosphere at Anfield is like a morgue for most games, is treated with a vitriolic response, suggesting they're doping could result in far worse things. But go on believing that Liverpool would never cheat or lie.
Click to expand...

If you believe Salah is a great player due to Liverpool and Klopp doping him or something then I hope your lizard overlords look kindly upon you today and that one day man will land on the Moon.
 
JelavicBrate2 said:
Believe what you want to believe, if you believe that Klopp is simply this amazing manager, who can ensure that they can compete with a small squad in multiple competitions, when other top clubs rest players or get injuries all season then fine. So United's side of 08/09. VDS or foster in goal. Evra, Vidic, Ferdinand, O Shea, Evans Neville in defence. Ronaldo, Giggs, Nani, Anderson, Fletcher, Carrick, Scholes in midfield. Rooney, Berbatov, Tevez and Welbeck up front. They were far better across the pitch, than any of Klopps sides. Take a look at Chelseas teams, Arsenals teams and City's team that won titles, packed to the brim with quality,chad strength in depth. Players who left went on to decent careers at other clubs. Yet not one of Klopps rejects has done anything elsewhere after leaving. Macherano, Alonso, Suarez, or Sterling didn't become bad players after leaving Anfield. Yes the fact that Rooney, Torres, Tevez, RVP, Eto, Owen, Fowler, Lukaku, Aguero Villa and Messi were all playing at a top level from an early age at big clubs. Yet as has been pointed out nobody noticed Salah. If something doesn't make sense it generally isn't true. Milner was an alright midfielder in his prime, he has somehow after an incredibly average City side got rid of him, played constantly in a Liverpool side that play higher intensity football all as he's coming the end of his career. Of course it makes perfect sense that it's just Ribena, that's helped him keep up.



It's not like people cover up the wrong doings of Liverpool FC and their fans. That would never happen, Heysel was caused by Chelsea fans. Despite the fact that Liverpool fans robbed their fans in Athens and tried to bunk in then. They did it it Madrid, their highly witty supporters have continually boasted about it, it was actually all local Arabs, who only tried to bunk in the Liverpool end. Rascals given Liberpool a bad reputation. When Suarez repeatedly called Evra the N word, while in a argument it was actually a term of endearment, shame on Evra for bringing Liberpool bad publicity. See Liberpool are an honest club they first denied he said it and made a big song and dance over Evra lying, then when Suarez admitted to it changed the script and said it was cultural. Yet all the RS players involved other than when Evra challenged spitty, have got away with it. Its not like Liverpool would cover up one of their players beating up a DJ, or miraculously fail to catch anyone attacking City's coach.

Look at the reaction to Neville simply pointing out the atmosphere was poor at Anfield v United. He was criticized in the Echo and his comments somehow were compared to people mocking Hillsborough. When has anyone on here or anywhere else made a huge deal about a pundit saying the atmosphere happened to be poor at GP at a particular game warranted such a response. Look at the reaction to Pickfords challenge, somehow on here said it was mentioned recently while they we watching a non league game with no relevance to Liverpool. The idea that anyone in the media or the authorities would investigate Liberpool for any wrong doing is ridiculous. Pointing out a blatant fact such as the atmosphere at Anfield is like a morgue for most games, is treated with a vitriolic response, suggesting they're doping could result in far worse things. But go on believing that Liverpool would never cheat or lie.
Click to expand...

The 'logic' you're applying to Salah here can also be applied to Kevin De Bruyne, and he works under a manager who has actually been banned for doping. Did that not fit the narrative?
 
JelavicBrate2 said:
Believe what you want to believe, if you believe that Klopp is simply this amazing manager, who can ensure that they can compete with a small squad in multiple competitions, when other top clubs rest players or get injuries all season then fine. So United's side of 08/09. VDS or foster in goal. Evra, Vidic, Ferdinand, O Shea, Evans Neville in defence. Ronaldo, Giggs, Nani, Anderson, Fletcher, Carrick, Scholes in midfield. Rooney, Berbatov, Tevez and Welbeck up front. They were far better across the pitch, than any of Klopps sides. Take a look at Chelseas teams, Arsenals teams and City's team that won titles, packed to the brim with quality,chad strength in depth. Players who left went on to decent careers at other clubs. Yet not one of Klopps rejects has done anything elsewhere after leaving. Macherano, Alonso, Suarez, or Sterling didn't become bad players after leaving Anfield. Yes the fact that Rooney, Torres, Tevez, RVP, Eto, Owen, Fowler, Lukaku, Aguero Villa and Messi were all playing at a top level from an early age at big clubs. Yet as has been pointed out nobody noticed Salah. If something doesn't make sense it generally isn't true. Milner was an alright midfielder in his prime, he has somehow after an incredibly average City side got rid of him, played constantly in a Liverpool side that play higher intensity football all as he's coming the end of his career. Of course it makes perfect sense that it's just Ribena, that's helped him keep up.



It's not like people cover up the wrong doings of Liverpool FC and their fans. That would never happen, Heysel was caused by Chelsea fans. Despite the fact that Liverpool fans robbed their fans in Athens and tried to bunk in then. They did it it Madrid, their highly witty supporters have continually boasted about it, it was actually all local Arabs, who only tried to bunk in the Liverpool end. Rascals given Liberpool a bad reputation. When Suarez repeatedly called Evra the N word, while in a argument it was actually a term of endearment, shame on Evra for bringing Liberpool bad publicity. See Liberpool are an honest club they first denied he said it and made a big song and dance over Evra lying, then when Suarez admitted to it changed the script and said it was cultural. Yet all the RS players involved other than when Evra challenged spitty, have got away with it. Its not like Liverpool would cover up one of their players beating up a DJ, or miraculously fail to catch anyone attacking City's coach.

Look at the reaction to Neville simply pointing out the atmosphere was poor at Anfield v United. He was criticized in the Echo and his comments somehow were compared to people mocking Hillsborough. When has anyone on here or anywhere else made a huge deal about a pundit saying the atmosphere happened to be poor at GP at a particular game warranted such a response. Look at the reaction to Pickfords challenge, somehow on here said it was mentioned recently while they we watching a non league game with no relevance to Liverpool. The idea that anyone in the media or the authorities would investigate Liberpool for any wrong doing is ridiculous. Pointing out a blatant fact such as the atmosphere at Anfield is like a morgue for most games, is treated with a vitriolic response, suggesting they're doping could result in far worse things. But go on believing that Liverpool would never cheat or lie.
Click to expand...

Brilliant post mate. I can see you triggering a few lurking kopites with this post ☕️
 

Nymzee said:
If you believe Salah is a great player due to Liverpool and Klopp doping him or something then I hope your lizard overlords look kindly upon you today and that one day man will land on the Moon.
Click to expand...
Doping doesn't make Salah skilful, look at Deulofeu he was incredibly skilful, just didn't have that extra energy to last 90 minutes. Lots of great players in the past, such as Le Tissier and others wouldn't be able to keep up nowadays. There have been plenty of players who were great in La Liga, yet struggled here because of how intense games can be. Liverpool don't play like Guardiolas Barca sides, where Xavi and Iniesta passed through sides, look at the way they played how skilful they were. Liverpool's success under Klopp has been built on just running around like headless chickens. Allardyce worked out if you just sit back and don't let them in behind, they can't do much to you. When we stopped them winning the league at GP, other than once when Salah got in behind, they didn't look dangerous. Doping isn't going to turn us into Guardiolas Barca, it isn't going to turn Beto into prime Henry. It is you you going to help you run around all game, force opponents into making mistakes. Doesn't work when your playing against Modric and he has you running around like headless chickens all game. They were exposed by Ancelotti as having very little skill in their side. When Ragnick or whatever his name was asked how United struggled to keep players fit, in 1 competition, yet Liverpool are able to keep a similar squad week in week out in 4 competitions and not get any major injuries he was giving a subtle hint. Barca rested their whole team before playing at Anfield, yet Liverpool played a highly intense match at Newcastle, then put in a performance of a lifetime against Barca.
 


Welcome to GrandOldTeam

Get involved. Registration is simple and free.

Register
Back
Top