Bet he loves him now
[video=youtube;X3BYp9FfORc]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X3BYp9FfORc[/video]
[video=youtube;X3BYp9FfORc]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X3BYp9FfORc[/video]
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I'm not denying anything.
What i'm saying is we have another Kopite on here trying to lay blame on others by diverting your own scummy behavior; go and ask Stan Collymore. In fact, ask Patrice Evra, the Oldham lad and John Barnes. Yes John Barnes, maybe you're a bit too young to remember your own fans behaviour.
You've gone back over 10 years, why?? Because your team and supporters over the last couple of years have been an absolute disgrace??
Its never your fault lad, never
Bet he loves him now
[video=youtube;X3BYp9FfORc]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X3BYp9FfORc[/video]
Collymore gets it from all sides, the people who act like bellends on twitter/YouTube/Facebook. Have a look at the stuff collymore retweets when he starts courting controversy, it's every clubs divs that do it.
The evra case was a joke (from a lawyer mate who's a manc), the fact that evra had zero intention of taking it to the police like Ferdinand and more importantly the anti racism rentagobs didn't mention that says volumes, not to mention they used the lowest legal standards and in the words of a Tottenham supporting journalist 'didn't treat evra's evidence in the same way as suarez, as if they did the outcome would be different'. Oh and there's the case of evra changing his accusation as well, not to mention the number of times used. But ask yourself why the fa chose the lowest legal standard for this case (balance of probabilities), but for the emre/lescott case they used the highest standard (beyond reasonable doubt, same standard as would be used in a criminal court) and the case was thrown out because Howard said emre said 'negro' and lescott said emre said '[Poor language removed]'. That is the very fishy thing with that case which very few brought up.
The Oldham lad, as I've said before the police threw out that case, so using a false case of racism is beyond pathetic really.
As opposed to you diverting blame and shifting position and spreading lies and misinformation
Like CountyRd ?
Do you agree regarding his spurious claims on us supposedly mocking Hillsborough as he said?
Collymore gets it from all sides, the people who act like bellends on twitter/YouTube/Facebook. Have a look at the stuff collymore retweets when he starts courting controversy, it's every clubs divs that do it.
The evra case was a joke (from a lawyer mate who's a manc), the fact that evra had zero intention of taking it to the police like Ferdinand and more importantly the anti racism rentagobs didn't mention that says volumes, not to mention they used the lowest legal standards and in the words of a Tottenham supporting journalist 'didn't treat evra's evidence in the same way as suarez, as if they did the outcome would be different'. Oh and there's the case of evra changing his accusation as well, not to mention the number of times used. But ask yourself why the fa chose the lowest legal standard for this case (balance of probabilities), but for the emre/lescott case they used the highest standard (beyond reasonable doubt, same standard as would be used in a criminal court) and the case was thrown out because Howard said emre said 'negro' and lescott said emre said '[Poor language removed]'. That is the very fishy thing with that case which very few brought up.
The Oldham lad, as I've said before the police threw out that case, so using a false case of racism is beyond pathetic really.
Collymore gets it from all sides, the people who act like bellends on twitter/YouTube/Facebook. Have a look at the stuff collymore retweets when he starts courting controversy, it's every clubs divs that do it.
The evra case was a joke (from a lawyer mate who's a manc), the fact that evra had zero intention of taking it to the police like Ferdinand and more importantly the anti racism rentagobs didn't mention that says volumes, not to mention they used the lowest legal standards and in the words of a Tottenham supporting journalist 'didn't treat evra's evidence in the same way as suarez, as if they did the outcome would be different'. Oh and there's the case of evra changing his accusation as well, not to mention the number of times used. But ask yourself why the fa chose the lowest legal standard for this case (balance of probabilities), but for the emre/lescott case they used the highest standard (beyond reasonable doubt, same standard as would be used in a criminal court) and the case was thrown out because Howard said emre said 'negro' and lescott said emre said '[Poor language removed]'. That is the very fishy thing with that case which very few brought up.
The Oldham lad, as I've said before the police threw out that case, so using a false case of racism is beyond pathetic really.
Disgusting.... You need removing from this site.
Never known it to happen in the ground (have said I've seen it online) but it wouldn't stun me if some coked up bellend in the away end did a face crushing gesture or waved a copy of the rag or something idiotic like that, do know decent reds who swear down that they've seen other clubs fans do those gestures
Agree mate. It DOESNT happen in our end anymore and thats great. But it makes me uneasy when some users get on thier high horse about it without knowing about our history. You cant point it out without getting called out for being a red.
Perhaps i shouldnt bring it up maybe, but i dont want us to be burying our heads in the sand about it while beating them with it. Maybe LFC should take note from efc how to turn the club around from those days.