Me and a lad from work discussed this earlier. Liverpool fans using the argument FIFA are punishing Liverpool with this ban, which is unfair would follow the same logic that a team should be able to bring on a sub when a player is sent off in a match, since they're punishing the team, as well as the individual.
The other argument that they're now forced to pay him £4m while he can't play for them and then blame FIFA for this is again ridiculous. They have internal options to reprimand him and fine him 2, 3, 6, 8, 12 weeks wages to recoup cash if they want to. But they won't, they don't want to upset a prize asset. Instead of looking at their man who did wrong and take action, they'd rather moan and play the victim card.
If I spent time prison, ignoring the fact I'd instantly lose my job, and my employer had been paying my salary while I was unable to work for them due to misconduct on my part (which was beyond doubt), it'd be inconceivable that not only would I not be disciplined when I got out, but my employer would blame the police for putting me there and treat me as some misguided soul, above blame.
Don't get me wrong, I can appreciate the difficult position Liverpool are in. He is a world class player and offers them a lot of things on the pitch, and you only have to look at how John Terry's racism case was handled by Chelsea to see other clubs have approached things in a similar way before. But that doesn't mean it doesn't stink and that Liverpool are choosing a chance of on the field success over anything else by not only standing by their man (as there's arguments for supporting your own players in spite of their faults), but trying to absolve him of blame and look for excuses and to shift blame everywhere else.