Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
What funny is that they really believe their bull****e, Gerrard or Brendon was saying the changes the rs made at half time was to combat the long balls being played by everton and their subs worked. I'm confused with them to be honest.
'yeah bad decision yesterday it cost us 2 points, but should he (Suarez) have been on the pitch? No in all honesty, if Rooney had done the identical 2 challenges on for example Sterling an secondly Agger we would be crying blue murder if he was still on the pitch. Also I think it is fair to say that they (Everton) have had their fair share of bad decisions in recent years against us including, Poll, Clattenburg and Rodwell's derby games so all in all lets suck it up lads anyway it was a fair result and it could have been worse if Pienaar (who was wrongly sent off, and subsequently banned for this match) and there is a chance that Suarez's tackle/foul/stamp put Mirallas out of the game especially if it is a metertarsel injury.
It's not going to be great if they do entice Drogba to play for them too. Which looks to be a possibility. They could have their own diving contest.
I think Gerrard should look at the stats, I know they don't always tell the whole story but how can a team come to disrupt a game by not playing football and end up with more possession, a higher pass success rate (and I thought we were very sloppy at times), a lower long ball percentage, more shots and more shots on target.
The deluded cultists will lap it up and not question their own team though.
Louise Walker on Twitter: "Disappointed with the continued anti-Suarez attitude comments today. It is being to look like a witch hunt."
why the witch hunt all the time!
Louise Walker on Twitter: "Disappointed with the continued anti-Suarez attitude comments today. It is being to look like a witch hunt."
why the witch hunt all the time!