https://www.theguardian.com/footbal...-gary-mcallister-liverpool-everton-april-2001
From yesterday's Guardian.
A horrendous event that still bugs me to be fair. One of those slow-motion moments when you knew it could be averted, but the inevitable surrender was all too clear. A total F UP of a day.
However, take note of this snide aside in the article:
"Reporting for the Guardian, Paul Walker described the 164th meeting of Merseyside’s big two as “chaotic” and “spiteful” and for Liverpool, the hostilities began prior to kick-off when a minority of Everton fans failed to respect a minute’s silence for the 96 victims of the Hillsborough disaster".
Hmmm. IRRC (I should do as I was there), the stadium announcer made reference to Hillsborough, Bradford, Ibrox, the (then recent) stadium disaster in South Africa...and that was it. Quite why someone at the club felt the need to announce these events over the PA and
not include the disaster that occurred on May 29th 1985 is mystifying. The fact it was televised made it even worse. I clearly remember a voice in the Bullens during the supposed silence yelling out: "What abbar Heysel?"
To be completely honest, I was thinking absolutely the same thing myself. But in a weird way, it felt as though the PA statement was almost inciting someone to shout out a response. By leaving that gap, it was almost as if a retort was
expected. Do I feel bad about the silence being disrupted? Or course I do, I'm ashamed that it happened. On the flip side however, the one blemish in our otherwise totally respectful approach to the anniversary of the disaster can be somewhat explained by the fact it was presented in an alarmingly selective manner and was seized on by a gleeful RS loving media.
An element of RS fans use the anniversary to try and make us look bad year-in, year-out, it seems. They are desperately willing us to break silences, attack memorials, do these phantom "Face crushing" gestures (nope, can't say I've ever seen them either, and if I had I would have given people doing it - whatever it may look like - a good slapping).
Bitterness? No. Cold reality? I would say so. This gradual revision of history and the attempt to minimize the disgraceful behaviour of their support and the subsequent "Let's move on and forget about it...." attitude of their playing staff involved (Apart from Phil Neal, who wanted payment to talk about it.)
It seems the media still want to pull a hatchet job and paint EFC as the bad guys. If history has taught us anything, that's far from the case.