What we needed was a poor man's DCL, therefore Rondon. I like broadhead more than most but he isn't much of a physical presence (admittedly the jury is still out on Rondon too)
Given that we deemed him good enough for a new 2 year contract would we not have been better keeping Broadhead as 3rd choice ST than bringing in Rondon. I know he's not good enough but if you are working on a budget surely Broadheads wages are less than Rondons. He was also game ready if needed. He has the added bonus he can play as a 10 or on either wing. This is not revionism as I would actually have released him but given where we were when we loaned him out this is why I'm now questioning it. He's basically a poor mans Richarlison. Hopefully on this loan spell he avoids injury and someone buys him so we can add pennies to the pot. He will never be good enough for here but is better than Rondon in my opinion.
get what you're saying but broadhead and rondon are 2 different types of forward. as you say hes poor mans richarlison whereas rondon seemingly is back up to DCL.
Dobbin might get more opportunities with broadhead out on loan.
Adblocking on an Everton fan site is kopite behaviour! ;)
We understand and appreciate why you use Ad-blocking software, but we ask that you kindly consider disabling your Ad-block for GrandOldTeam. We're a fan site ran by fans, for fans. GrandOldTeam costs over £7,000 per year and we rely on our ad revenue to keep the site sustainable. We work hard to ensure our ads aren't instrusive. If you can't or don't wish to disable your Ad-block, please consider upgrading your account for the cost of a pint a month here. Thank You.