Everton change bridging loan from Barclays to company in BVI

[Goat]

I've never seen either side give ground even when new or better information arrives....therefore I'm not with any of them !

Mostly everything on here around financials is conjecture regardless of which team you're with

I know, but it passes the time and its fun seeing people tie themselves in knots talking about needing proof on the internet, thats surely an oxymoron, I could show you proof that im a qualified Doctor, im not, but I could get it.

 

[Neiler]

I've never seen either side give ground even when new or better information arrives....therefore I'm not with any of them !

Mostly everything on here around financials is conjecture regardless of which team you're with

This, there are no teams, just whats best for Everton, telling bad whoppers though doesnt do anyone any favours really.

I would carry Bill out of Everton tomorow if there was a better viable option he had turned down - sadly there isnt.

 

[kenada_blue]

I know, but it passes the time and its fun seeing people tie themselves in knots talking about needing proof on the internet, thats surely an oxymoron, I could show you proof that im a qualified Doctor, im not, but I could get it.

I've got an itch around my pubic area.....what's your diagnosis, doc?

 

[formerly manx toffee]

I've got an itch around my pubic area.....what's your diagnosis, doc?

Are you Damons neighbour ?

 

[Frank Drebin]

I've got an itch around my pubic area.....what's your diagnosis, doc?

Without pictures its hard to diagnose. Im going to say AIDS. The bad kind.

 

[Goat]

This, there are no teams, just whats best for Everton, telling bad whoppers though doesnt do anyone any favours really.

I would carry Bill out of Everton tomorow if there was a better viable option he had turned down - sadly there isnt.

Nobodys telling lies tho, surely you are aware of this.

I would ask whos telling lies, but im sure your not 100% sure.

I've got an itch around my pubic area.....what's your diagnosis, doc?

Without pictures its hard to diagnose. Im going to say AIDS. The bad kind.

Im gonna go with my colleague here and say bad AIDS, I give you 6months tops.

 

[Neiler]

Nobodys telling lies tho, surely you are aware of this.

I would ask whos telling lies, but im sure your not 100% sure.





Im gonna go with my colleague here and say bad AIDS, I give you 6months tops.

Yes they are and whoopers need addressing and they will be, its misleading and distortive.

If you have a point to make then make it, mistruths give you a strong sense of the crediability of the poster.

 

[Seamus Colemole]

This, there are no teams, just whats best for Everton, telling bad whoppers though doesnt do anyone any favours really.

I would carry Bill out of Everton tomorow if there was a better viable option he had turned down - sadly there isnt.

And you know this for sure how?

Exactly, you don't.Your just assuming and using evidence that we haven't been sold to support your assumption that its because we haven't recieved a viable offer.

Whereas Davek and other assume we haven't been sold because Bill has turned down viable offers. And you castigate them for it.

 

[Neiler]

And you know this for sure how?

Exactly, you don't.Your just assuming and using evidence that we haven't been sold to support your assumption that its because we haven't recieved a viable offer.

Whereas Davek and other assume we haven't been sold because Bill has turned down viable offers. And you castigate them for it.

Ha ha couldnt resist mate.


Thats about the crux mate, everyone beleives what they beleive. Whoopers are a different story though - to be fair no one needs to mislead based on mistruth.

But to be fair your point has been done to death, i choose life.

 

[Frank Drebin]

Broadly yes.

Goodnight

lol-tastic

 

[davek]

Yes they are and whoopers need addressing and they will be, its misleading and distortive.

If you have a point to make then make it, mistruths give you a strong sense of the crediability of the poster.

Mate, you've done more u-turns than a cabbie on here. Does that count as misleading people too?

BTW, I want you back as the old Neiler asap. You were good once and can be again.

 

[Matt Damon]

Prentice in writing ORIGINAL article without lifting it from GOT shocker. Maybe he used this place as inspiration? :huh:

I'm awaiting Dave K's response to the below....

http://www.liverpoolecho.co.uk/ever...not-brawling-in-the-stands-100252-29305331/3/

The number of conspiracy theories, the profusion of well written but seriously flawed articles masquerading as investigative journalism and the basic mischief-making is staggering.

Websites which are unpoliced and not subject to the legal and journalistic boundaries which govern the printed press have the capability to whip up the masses into, at best, indignation, at worst outright anger.

The latest conspiracy, presented as fact, concerns a £13m loan taken out by Everton from one of their own directors.

The loan came from the Vibrac Corporation based in the British Virgin Islands, which is also a business address used by Robert Earl. Hence some fans putting two and two together and making five.

The facts are far less sinister.

The loan is not a new loan. And Robert Earl, or anybody even remotely connected to him, is not the lender.

It’s a renewal of the same loan Everton have had in place for the past two seasons. The old one is paid back every year and a new one is taken out.

Everton have used a different lender this season because they offer a better rate.

The loan is £14m and is absolutely not an increase in borrowing. Bang goes that conspiracy theory. But there are plenty more.

Think the letter that Mr Peter Roberts sent in is pretty shocking. If kids get hurt because tits are brawling in the stands what are the tits going to say then? Pathetic behaviour.

A bit like Gary Lineker 85/86's twitter ranting and raving which are a disgrace.







Separately, Prentice needs to ask searching questions (regularly) of EFC. Its the responsibility of the press to do so including on the finances of the club. Its in the finances that many Evertonians worries lay. Specifically commercial revenues and sponsorship questions.


Something they haven't done anywhere near enough of due to their obvious preference in coverage. The Echo can deny it all they want. We all know its there.

Its a lack of searching questions that has lead to this position amongst other things.

Discuss.

 

[Hibbert&Ernie]

Websites which are unpoliced and not subject to the legal and journalistic boundaries which govern the printed press have the capability to whip up the masses into, at best, indignation, at worst outright anger.

Have been pointing out the propagandists and their bile for a while now. The 'evidence please' posts made them change tact. Makes for lots of fun though.

 

[davek]

Prentice in writing ORIGINAL article without lifting it from GOT shocker. Maybe he used this place as inspiration? :huh:

I'm awaiting Dave K's response to the below....

http://www.liverpoolecho.co.uk/ever...not-brawling-in-the-stands-100252-29305331/3/




Think the letter that Mr Peter Roberts sent in is pretty shocking. If kids get hurt because tits are brawling in the stands what are the tits going to say then? Pathetic behaviour.

A bit like Gary Lineker 85/86's twitter ranting and raving which are a disgrace.







Separately, Prentice needs to ask searching questions (regularly) of EFC. Its the responsibility of the press to do so including on the finances of the club. Its in the finances that many Evertonians worries lay. Specifically commercial revenues and sponsorship questions.


Something they haven't done anywhere near enough of due to their obvious preference in coverage. The Echo can deny it all they want. We all know its there.

Its a lack of searching questions that has lead to this position amongst other things.

Discuss.

You want my response to "Robert Earl or anyone remotely connected to him is not the lender"....here it is:

You think the words of an Echo reporter, who cant even be arsed to check out the fact that a company run out of that island cant be verified as to who's set it up or running it, should be taken seriously? In the absence of ever getting 100% proof we'll just have to use our judgement. Be my guest if you want to lump in with Prentice et al.

And by the way, you cant have it both ways: you cant be saying that this info is credible and state that the Echo are pulling their punches on who is or isn't seeking to buy Everton.

 

[pfim]

You want my response to "Robert Earl or anyone remotely connected to him is not the lender"....here it is:

You think the words of an Echo reporter, who cant even be arsed to check out the fact that a company run out of that island cant be verified as to who's set it up or running it, should be taken seriously? In the absence of ever getting 100% proof we'll just have to use our judgement. Be my guest if you want to lump in with Prentice et al.

And by the way, you cant have it both ways: you cant be saying that this info is credible and state that the Echo are pulling their punches on who is or isn't seeking to buy Everton.

I'm sorry to say, but the story isn't that ridiculous. I'm sure there are hundreds of companies registered to that specific address.

And how in the world is the reporter supposed to check who owns that company or is running it? It's likely not even a company, by the common definition. It's probably little more than a piece of paper.