does no-one trust the board?
the move is about money. We don't have any. We need money to help compete with the spending of our neighbours.
We're not surrendering the city. It's ours.
Liverpool is owned by yanks and supported by scandanavians.
Kirby is Liverpool, same as Huyton etc.
Would you rather stay in the city and watch everton lose its manager, best players etc. watch us get overtaken, relegated or worse go bankrupt.
In ten years time we could be buying the next ronaldinho or hunting around for the next gavin mccann on the cheap.
A new stadium financed by other parties will ensure that money can be heavily invested in the team and we remain attractive to investors.
Or we could watch GP fall around us, on and off the pitch.
Kirby aint ideal, but its our only option.
Thats just it mate, it aint our only option it never was never will be.
Its not about distrust of the board, its not about conspiracy theories either.
Its about being 'told' HOW to vote and then giving a completely one sided forecast of what 'could' happen.
Its not about watching gp fall down either, I'm not saying necessarily stay at gp or liverpool.
I just cant get my head around why people think this stadium is going to be so great for our future and finances.
It will be a whole lot better than goodison park, but very mediocre in the grand scheme of things, and most definitely NOT going to propel us into buying players like ronaldinho alone.
An extra £10m a season has been touted by wyness, and he has already told us there may be a possibility of us needing another long term loan to help pay for it, which could cost anything up tp £2m a season in repayments and interest.
How much good is an 'extra' £10m a season going to do for us?
From here on in an average player is going to cost £6/7m then add wages onto it and we are not going to be buying many galactico's.
I'm not saying we dont need to move etc,but I think the board have been short-sighted about all this.
And I think they are short changing the name and the fans.
IMO the proposed kirkby stadium is not the best option for our club, but merely a very convenient one.
Only by voting NO would the board have been forced to eat humble pie, get off their arse and come up with viable alternatives.
The business world is a very fluid and rapidly changing place, esp investment sectors.
So for wyness to paint a picture of kirkby or bust is negligent.