Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
They are cashing in on vlahovic because he's got 18 months left. If he had 3 years then he'd be a fair chunk more.80-100 ahhahahaa mate you are so far off it it's unreal.
That vlahovic from fiorentina is being touted at 58m, he's younger and scored a lot more than DCL has over the last couple of years.
I know who I'd rather have if I was a "top" club
We need a midfield.We need an attacker who can play in between midfield and the forwards who can score goals. He's available on loan, we currently have no money, so it is logical.
Unfortunately, we currently have no manager.
Even more mental when you think he might not actually playThat loan deal for El Ghazi was mental. It needlessly hinders us by reducing the amount of prem loans we can have, and it's clear this is the market that we will operate in, that's if Moshiri hasn't totally given up already.
Well I mean Ali can play in midfield. I don't think it's his best role but he can play in a three or as the 10 in a 4231. He just isn't like a playmaker type in how he plays.We need a midfield.
No point signing anyone to play BETWEEN the midfield and the forwards when we don't have a functioning midfield.
There's no logic to signing a player you DON'T need and failing to sign players you DO need. That's what we've done with El Ghazi.
Is Pereria going to convince him? I think not
Hes out of contract in June. They will want cash now
It was a honor agreement, he could of signed for anybody after the loan period and no payment required to Man City but part of the deal was that we would pay a fee if see decided to sign him. I think we agreed to a fee of 5/6 mil but may be wrong, we kept to the agreement.I remeber when we signed Barry on loan for the final 6 months or year of his contract and then when we signed him as a free agent …. We still had to pay …