mightymoyes
Player Valuation: £70m
A bit harsh. He's competing against some of the best midfielders in Europe at Chelsea.
having Holgate, Godfrey, Doucoure etc passing him hospital balls isn't gonna make him look any better
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
A bit harsh. He's competing against some of the best midfielders in Europe at Chelsea.
No? You want to read what I said again?
I'm not really sure that's relevant? Are tidy ball players useful? Yes, of course. Do I think either that Spain team or any of Pep's teams have been built to accommodate one tidy ball player? Absolutely not.
…a bit underwhelming.
I’d prefer to see him roaming between the midfield and forwards.Im surprissd posters wouldnt see Gilmour as a 'deep lying roaming playmaker'.
Given license to play and roam between defence and midfield and then sitting as an anchor when we dont have the ball to cut out through balls.
That would allow us to play on the front foot, take pressure off the defence and have a gap between them and the central midfielders.
...about which no-one cares at all.The women are doing loads of business.
He's lightweight, no-paced and cant pick a forward ball out. He's always looking to work the ball wide.
Norwich fans were in uproar about how outrageously bad he was.
Yes please.Can we have rule, that if someone says they want or don't want a player they say why? Not just they are rubbish (or what other ways of say that).
Just getting bored of reading don't want him with no real reason.
I am not sure if you could be more wrong.Nobody is going to build their entire team around a player who has 0 goals and 2 assists in 65 senior appearances. You build teams around matchwinners, not around neat and tidy ball players.
Hes no brick outhouse that’s for sureAnyone who rates Gilmour is utterly clueless about football.
If we signed Gilmour it's gonna have to be a three man mid, for that alone I'm inOh yeah, absolutely. Same would apply if it's Winks that he gets to play this pivot role though
He wants someone who can play on the half turn, take the ball off the defenders and play through the lines. Gilmour and Winks can both do that, but they're both lightweight and you're going to need to compensate for that with having physical presence in there. Doucoure is the only one who gives you that in the current squad, so you'd want one more - and that explains the links to the likes of Onana, Vranckx and even Gallagher to a degree
He sounds like a real talent the way you describe him...I wonder why Chelsea dont want him, Norwich were unaffected by his genius, and why there isn't a long line of suitors for him?He can definitely pick a forward pass mate, I’ve seen him split a defence. He has a low centre of gravity which means he has agility, mobility and quick motion above the norm and quick feet. he’s not a winger so doesn’t need blistering pace. He has speed of thought.
He’s a wonderful reader of the game, he can turn on the ball and transition any way, he speeds the game up or he can slow it down, he can play in triangles probing, or he can beak a line if its on.
I’ve no concerns about the lads talent, I'm more concerned that our players wouldn’t be up to his level of keeping possession.
If you have him at 6 and he’s pulling strings, you have to commit a player to pressure him from your engine room and that creates gaps.