Install the app
How to install the app on iOS

Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.

Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

 

Everton Summer Transfer Thread - 2022

Status
Not open for further replies.
ToffeeTim said:
No it can't
Click to expand...

Course it can. Not necessarily saying we sell Richy and bring in a direct replacement but if you sell Richy in and bring in 3 players then you’d expect that those contributions to be made up somewhere by those 3 or those 3 would add extra value that means our existing players score or assist more.

Richy is good but I don’t think he is world class so it’s not like he’s irreplaceable
 
UltraVires said:
Course it can. Not necessarily saying we sell Richy and bring in a direct replacement but if you sell Richy in and bring in 3 players then you’d expect that those contributions to be made up somewhere by those 3 or those 3 would add extra value that means our existing players score or assist more.

Richy is good but I don’t think he is world class so it’s not like he’s irreplaceable
Click to expand...
It can be done but I definitely disagree that its going to be easy
 
BainesontoastNEW said:
Imagine if Ziyech came in and had a similar impact to Payet at West Ham. I have them down as being similar profiles for some reason. Feel free to shoot me down if I'm being misled with my thinking!
Click to expand...

Would be very surprised if Ziyech swapped Chelsea for Everton, also his wages must be huge, wouldn't say no to him, but still want Gallagher.
 
Raino85 said:
From a book point of view wouldnt it make sence for deals to be seperate?
Click to expand...
That's what I thought.

But I read yesterday that if we sold Rich for example at 20m + player a + player b + player c those 3 players can be booked as zero value (no amortisation cost), only wages.

If we really wanted A, B and C it's a good deal.

It would also really annoy Watford as they only get 10% if we sell over 40m ;) lol
 

BNJ1878 said:
That's what I thought.

But I read yesterday that if we sold Rich for example at 20m + player a + player b + player c those 3 players can be booked as zero value (no amortisation cost), only wages.

If we really wanted A, B and C it's a good deal.

It would also really annoy Watford as they only get 10% if we sell over 40m ;) lol
Click to expand...

Surely it does not work like that and the deal would need to be fully valued to determine the Watford share?
 
MikelsGoat said:
It would.

Every player would need a price, for accounting purposes.
Click to expand...
Could help with FFP by over valuing either way.

Think it happened in Italy last year were a swap happened between 2 bog standard players about 10m each and they valued them at 60m or somthing silly like that.
 
willo30 said:
Could help with FFP by over valuing either way.

Think it happened in Italy last year were a swap happened between 2 bog standard players about 10m each and they valued them at 60m or somthing silly like that.
Click to expand...
You could certainly overvalue the deal.

The Artur and Pjanic was the 1 your thinking of.

On 29 June 2020, Juventus announced that they had reached an agreement with Barcelona for the transfer of Pjanić on a deal worth €60 million, plus a maximum of €5 million in bonuses, to be effective following the conclusion of the 2019–20 season. The deal was also coordinated with a swap of Arthur, whom Juve signed for €72 million, plus a maximum of €10 million in bonuses
 

ToffeeTim said:
It can be done but I definitely disagree that its going to be easy
Click to expand...
I didn’t say it was going to be easy, I just said he’s not irreplaceable. It’s a gamble because it relies on the club getting the replacement(s) right and history tells us that’s not likely.
 

Status
Not open for further replies.

Welcome to GrandOldTeam

Get involved. Registration is simple and free.

Register
Back
Top