We have two strikers already mate, one of them is about to go to an Olympic final with Brazil.
Whether Richarlison plays left or right or up front, he's a forward. So another forward was never going to be a priority unless we sold Kean - which I'm sure is still part of the plan.
I think Ings is a good signing for them. But with our current financial position there'd no chance we could be going on and spending that much money on an injury prone player with a year left on his deal.
I think S'ton have got a good deal financially and better than they'd have got from most other clubs who aren't, for whatever reason, currently as flush as Villa.
City looked at Ings, very closely. They wouldn't have paid £25-30m for him, that's for sure. But yes, think he's a very good addition for Villa.
I consider Richardson an inside forward myself, rather than a natural no 9, which I think both Watkins and Ings are. It’s like Son and Kane, I consider him an inside forward to, to Kane no 9. Two forward positions granted but separate skill sets and roles.
I think the idea would be player trading, if Moise goes we need a support striker in my opinion. So your looking at making a profit on flipping Moise for someone like Ings, that was my take anyway.
Given the context business wise it’s a great deal for Southampton, in footballing terms it could be catasphruc, he will be a huge miss for them, footballing wise he’s worth more to Southampton then 25 mill.
As Villa fan says, if they get 4 years out of him, at 10- 15 goals a year, it’s about 6 mill a year, it’s defo worth that for PL goals, presuming fitness of course which is a risk.
It’s the equation you run, we took Jamo on last season, on the same basis really, we knew we might only get 20 games a season out of him, but PL goals are valuable, and we took a risk on his output, Villa doing like wise, I know we got Jamo on a free but we’re likely paying him a lot more than Villa are paying Ings.