Everton Transfer Thread 2016

[Smithy89]

Id snap Wilshere up in an instant on loan, don't care what anyone says... when he's fit he can be outstanding. He's a London boy and Arsenal fan though... he won't be coming Everton.

He went on loan to Bolton so the London thing isn't a factor I don't think and he actually grew up a West Ham fan and I imagine thats where he'll end up

 

[Seanjd]

It's all in his head.

Broken legs often are

 

[BlueToff]

McCarthy out and Wilshere (loan) & Witsel would be great business.

Witsel isn't coming mate

(vault me)

 

[MACCA75]

Why should it?

We've improved a lot on last season by just bringing in a better manager who can in turn get the best out of the good players we had.

We've added four quality players and are looking to add more.

It's been a solid window. It could still get better.

It 'should' because a far far greater available budget should give us far more options in the transfer market.

I find your devils advocate routine utterly tedious.

 

[Connor]

There's some absolute [Poor language removed] shouts for signings and then there's Jack Wilshere [Poor language removed].

 

[BlueToff]

It 'should' because a far far greater available budget should give us far more options in the transfer market.

I find your devils advocate routine utterly tedious.

My point was it's already been a good window and yes, though we need more quality in, that won't change.

 

[AaronTheBlue]

Id have to completely question your ability to judge footballing ability if you truly think he is 'dog turd'.

he is a absolutely bang average player who is living off of hype from when he was 18 years old, and hasn't advanced at all.

He is a injury prone average player who has done nothing for years.

 

[andy4efc]

It 'should' because a far far greater available budget should give us far more options in the transfer market.

I find your devils advocate routine utterly tedious.

All very good having a budget mate but when you don't have the reputation to go with it.

When city got taken over it took them a while. While we aren't anywhere near City's scale, the same applies.

 

[BlueToff]

All very good having a budget mate but when you don't have the reputation to go with it.

When city got taken over it took them a while. While we aren't anywhere near City's scale, the same applies.

and now everybody has more money as well

it's not even playing devil's advocate, I still think we'll get three in and they'll all be additions that improve us.

they just won't be superstars.

But when was the last time we signed seven players in a window (if indeed we did get three more)?

 

[Paul w]

Broken legs often are

No mate broken legs are real his problem is he thinks he has injuries a bit like saha.

 

[Donald Twain]

There's some absolute [Poor language removed] shouts for signings and then there's Jack Wilshere [Poor language removed].

Say again !

 

[longers]

he is a absolutely bang average player who is living off of hype from when he was 18 years old, and hasn't advanced at all.

He is a injury prone average player who has done nothing for years.

 

[Connor]

Say again !

Jack Wilshere is a useless crock who can't stay fit and hasn't improved since he became a prospect from Football Manager 10.

 

[PredictThis]

I would buy Wilshere but see little benefit for a loan. Why help what we hope will be a rival get a player fit. Just no big reward if the player finds his form.

 

[toffeejack]

Based on several conversations, if pressed I'd say:

Begovic, Sissoko, striker (1 of 3) from Italian league and Kone. Surprise package would be one of the original big beasts we sought early in the summer.

what happened with joe hart? why have we now gone for begovic?