Everton Transfer Thread 2016

[TheSpaniard]

So are we signing Lenks then or not?

 

[dano26]

Let's just put it out there. Would we be happy with Stones being sold for, say 40 mill and Yam coming in for 30 mill and maybe one other. Easy isn't it yes or no?

 

[abelard]

This transfer saga is just a Ukrain in the neck

Donetsk why, but I think there could be more to this Odessa-y... we need to make a final offer: "Donbass us around anymore... Lvov it or leave it!"

*lowers head shamefully*

 

[marnie]

Let's just put it out there. Would we be happy with Stones being sold for, say 40 mill and Yam coming in for 30 mill and maybe one other. Easy isn't it yes or no?

Yes for me.......... think Stones head was turned in the last window... some of his performances this season have shown that.Just my opinion though.

 

[Dutch Toffee]

Let's just put it out there. Would we be happy with Stones being sold for, say 40 mill and Yam coming in for 30 mill and maybe one other. Easy isn't it yes or no?

No, weakening one area in order to strengthen another one isn't really making progress.

 

[bitter-no-better]

Let's just put it out there. Would we be happy with Stones being sold for, say 40 mill and Yam coming in for 30 mill and maybe one other. Easy isn't it yes or no?

It's a NO from me.

 

[SpurtingLesbian]

Yes for me.......... think Stones head was turned in the last window... some of his performances this season have shown that.Just my opinion though.

calm down mate, as long as Naisey is still here to put his arm around him and keep his head strai..... oh....

 

[TheFIreRises]

Let's just put it out there. Would we be happy with Stones being sold for, say 40 mill and Yam coming in for 30 mill and maybe one other. Easy isn't it yes or no?

If we sell stones, we have to replace him with a center half, and a PL ready one at that.

No use weakening an already leaking defense to strengthen an already humming attack. We've sold Naismith, and if we need more funds than those raised by that sale for Yarmolenko it simply won't happen.

 

[tim cahill]

Please can we not call him Yarms?

It makes me cringe.

Ta x

Yarmy okay?

 

[ijjysmith]

 

[marnie]

If we sell stones, we have to replace him with a center half, and a PL ready one at that.

No use weakening an already leaking defense to strengthen an already humming attack. We've sold Naismith, and if we need more funds for Yarmolenko it probably simply won't happen.

So WHY is Stones so in demand........ if he was that good.... he would have shored up that defence in the absence of Jags. He hasn't and we are conceding for fun His head was messed up with by the hype and I don't think he can handle it.

 

[neil999]

View attachment 17276

26?!

 

[bitter-no-better]

Its all come from this website

http://www.ukrainefootball.net/ukraina/yarmolenko-pokinet-dinamo-v-blijayshuyu-nedelyu.html

Yarmolenko Dynamo leave next week
January 21, 2016 08:00

UF according to Expert Ukrainian Cup Cake Michael answered the question in an editorial conference.

First Borussia refused to transfer Yarmolenko now Arsenal, Everton and will soon refuse to remain until the end of the career Yarmolenko in Dynamo, but will be happy to Surkis.

Are you sure that the interest of "Arsenal" was real?I'm sure for Yarmolenko scouts watched the London club, but for these players follow all the top clubs.

As for the "Borussia": almost immediately after the information released "Build", it became known that the Germans simply did not pull the financial transfer. At the same time, "Dortmund" would be perhaps the best option because there are interested in Andrew as much interested in it, "Everton", but Igor Mikhailovich already twice refused "Borussia".

It remains "Everton". Money, like, podsobrali, want to complete the transfer to the Euro. Based on all the information that is at the moment, Yarmolenko in the next week will go to "Everton".

this article has got legs! I mean yarms !

 

[carlos21]

View attachment 17276

Just think Arsenal could put a bit in for him mate.

 

[Azza]

It's not happening.