Dalot hasnt played any regular football his whole career, which is a slight concern.
He’s just turned 21. Played for Porto & United, two big teams, it’s not too concerning. Maybe if he came from a lowly team it would be.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Dalot hasnt played any regular football his whole career, which is a slight concern.
He was out injured most of the season for some perspective.
That is reason enough to bail on this oneAlso... injury record...
Diogo Dalot - Injury history
This is the injury history of Diogo Dalot from Manchester United. On this page injuries as well as suspensions.www.transfermarkt.co.uk
I seen to recall that Steven Gerrard was injured at lot at the start of his career and then was largely injury free ( possibly because he inflicted injury on others )Also... injury record...
Diogo Dalot - Injury history
This is the injury history of Diogo Dalot from Manchester United. On this page injuries as well as suspensions.www.transfermarkt.co.uk
Agreed, I think people look at the club we're buying from rather than the player some times.People have really got to get over this thing about where we sign people from being what dictates whether it's a good signing or not.
For every example you give of a player signed from a club/league that's not worked, there'll be another one where it's been great.
So yep - we've signed some bad Top 6 rejects like Cleverley, Schneiderlin, Gibson, Delph, Walcott, Iwobi who've not worked out. But Howard, Neville, Kanchelskis, Lukaku were all good buys from big clubs who'd walk into this team.
Yep - we've signed some bad players from clubs lower in the table than us, like Sigurdsson, Williams, Bolasie. But then you could point to Gueye, Richarlison, Baines, Lescott, Jagielka who've come from that sort of club and been outstanding.
We've signed players from Barnsley (Stones, Holgate), Sheff Utd (DCL), Carlisle (Branthwaite) who look really promising - and we've had others plucked from lower league obscurity who've done nothing (Scott Spencer anyone?)
It's about the individual player, their qualities and what our management team and system of play can do with them. Utterly sick off people writing of signings/potential signings purely based on the team they currently play for. It's moronic.
I seen to recall that Steven Gerrard was injured at lot at the start of his career and then was largely injury free ( possibly because he inflicted injury on others )
Agreed, I think people look at the club we're buying from rather than the player some times.
People have really got to get over this thing about where we sign people from being what dictates whether it's a good signing or not.
For every example you give of a player signed from a club/league that's not worked, there'll be another one where it's been great.
So yep - we've signed some bad Top 6 rejects like Cleverley, Schneiderlin, Gibson, Delph, Walcott, Iwobi who've not worked out. But Howard, Neville, Kanchelskis, Lukaku were all good buys from big clubs who'd walk into this team.
Yep - we've signed some bad players from clubs lower in the table than us, like Sigurdsson, Williams, Bolasie. But then you could point to Gueye, Richarlison, Baines, Lescott, Jagielka who've come from that sort of club and been outstanding.
We've signed players from Barnsley (Stones, Holgate), Sheff Utd (DCL), Carlisle (Branthwaite) who look really promising - and we've had others plucked from lower league obscurity who've done nothing (Scott Spencer anyone?)
It's about the individual player, their qualities and what our management team and system of play can do with them. Utterly sick off people writing of signings/potential signings purely based on the team they currently play for. It's moronic.
That is reason enough to bail on this one
I guess it could be be why he is being priced at 10 million. He has three years left on his contract. If United are seeking 10 million then it means they are eager to get rid.
United aren't in the habit of letting good players go on the cheap, and if he was in demand, then the market itself would be valuing him at far more than 10 million. There would be competition for his signature.
It reminds me of our bid for Delph. Reportedly, we made an opening bid of 8 million and were expecting it to be rejected and subject to negotiation, but City just said "Yes please" and got rid of him as soon as they possibly could because he was bad crap with a bad injury record.
This player is not in demand!
I agree with what you say and would throw Gareth Barry into the success column. However, it does irk when you have geniuses like Paul Scholes saying players are not good enough for Man Utd and should move to Everton.People have really got to get over this thing about where we sign people from being what dictates whether it's a good signing or not.
For every example you give of a player signed from a club/league that's not worked, there'll be another one where it's been great.
So yep - we've signed some bad Top 6 rejects like Cleverley, Schneiderlin, Gibson, Delph, Walcott, Iwobi who've not worked out. But Howard, Neville, Kanchelskis, Lukaku were all good buys from big clubs who'd walk into this team.
Yep - we've signed some bad players from clubs lower in the table than us, like Sigurdsson, Williams, Bolasie. But then you could point to Gueye, Richarlison, Baines, Lescott, Jagielka who've come from that sort of club and been outstanding.
We've signed players from Barnsley (Stones, Holgate), Sheff Utd (DCL), Carlisle (Branthwaite) who look really promising - and we've had others plucked from lower league obscurity who've done nothing (Scott Spencer anyone?)
It's about the individual player, their qualities and what our management team and system of play can do with them. Utterly sick off people writing of signings/potential signings purely based on the team they currently play for. It's moronic.