catcherintherye
Player Valuation: £80m
Definitely true to a point but you can guarantee that Kean would have come on on Sunday, at least for half an hour, maybe at half time. He might not have done anything, but all it means is we're now bringing on someone who would have been below him in the pecking order. He wasn't effective enough last year but we either had to hope he improved or swap him for someone who could have more of an impact. As it is, without him or Walcott, we're definitely short of options for changing it up.
I'm not so sure we are out of options but out of quality. We brought on Gordon and Bernard who are not bad players. The question to me is really 2 fold;
1) Is Kean better than those players (potentially yes)
2) Would have been a better fit for Richarlinson than Iwobi/Bernard? For me absolutely.
Iwobi/Bernard to me feel like a very poor mans James. They want to come inside and dictate play. They don't look to stretch the game/opponents.
Gordon is probably the wildcard in this, in that he can stretch the play and run in behind.
I am a little though. I can understand that if DCL goes down Richarlinson is the backup 9 and nobody would say it is not a goo backup option, but who do we have who can then replace Richarlinson on the left?