There is little evidence that during the Black Death the rat was a carrier of the bubonic plague.
http://www.historyextra.com/article...ngs-you-probably-didnt-know-about-black-death
Yeah, not the greatest article though is it.
Not only textbooks but serious monographs on the Black Death and its successive waves of plague into the early 19th century in Europe go on about rats (usually the black ones) and fleas without qualification. But what is the evidence?
No contemporary observers described any epizootic [animal epidemic] of rats or of any other rodents immediately before or during the Black Death, or during any later plagues in Europe – that is, until the ‘third pandemic’ at the end of the 19th century. Yet in subtropical regions of Africa and China, descriptions of ‘rat falls’ accompanying a human disease with buboes in the principal lymph nodes reach back at least to the 18th century.
As for fleas, unlike during the ‘third pandemic’, when plague cases and deaths followed closely the seasonal fertility cycles of various species of rat fleas, no such correlations are found with the Black Death or later European plagues before the end of the 19th century.
basically says 'not rats or fleas' but fails to actually give a cause.
And wasn't it largely a plague of poor hygiene rather than of class? As in, people with poor hygiene were more likely to contract it.