Install the app
How to install the app on iOS

Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.

Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

 

2018/19 Gylfi Sigurdsson

Status
Not open for further replies.
I just posted this in the Bernard thread, so will repeat here.

I looked at his stats from Sunday on Opta.

Distribution wise, these were his numbers:

Total attempted passes 36 - that's the third most behind Davies (37) and Digne (38).

His overall passing accuracy was 86.1%. That's the second most of the whole team, with Walcott's 94.4% (from 18 passes) the highest.

Gylfi made 28 passes in the opposition half, more than any other player. Davies made 27 though so that shows he was also trying to push us forward.

Of those 28 passes, 85.7% were accurate. Compare that to 70.4% from Davies (purely comparable as they attempted a similar number of passes in the opposition half).

Gylfi played 4 'key passes' (passes that led to a chance, basically). That was the highest on our team, and also the highest in the game.

Arsenal's highest in that regard was Ramsey, with 2 key passes. Now, Ramsey got 2 assists from both his key passes, whereas Gylfi got none. That again backs up the point that Gylfi creates chances, we just don't put them away (i.e. Walcott on Sunday, Walcott v Southampton).

Gyfli put in 8 crosses in total, including set pieces. Digne put in the most (10).

Gyfli put in 3 'good crosses', 2 of which were from open play, so that shows his 5 of his set pieces were poor, which needs to improve. Digne put in 7 open play crosses, but only one 'good cross' in total (from 10 attempted). I know that's hard to validate because it's opinion sort of, but these are what the stats say.

Defensively, Gyfli won possession back 6 times. That's the second highest in our team behind Gana and Walcott (both 8). Gylfi conceded possession 16 times, level with Richarlison. Digne and Davies led the way in that regard (26 and 20 respectively).

Sigurdsson had a total of 62 touches, the third highest on the team. Digne and Kenny had more, which probably shows our issue - everything was to our full-backs too deep too often.

Finally, the player tracking stats.

Gylfi covered 11.99km, more than any other player on the pitch. Davies was the closest to him on our team, covering 11.83, with Digne not far behind.

Believe it or not, Gylfi was actually clocked as having the highest average speed in our side, with 7.39 km/h.

He sprinted 11 times.

Richarlison was clocked as the quickest player on our team in terms of top speed, as he reached 33.51 km/h. Richarlison sprinted 25 times.

Gylfi's top speed was 32.09 km/h. That is the fourth highest on the team behind Richarlison, Keane and DCL. So, just bare in mind, that's quicker than Walcott, Digne, Bernard, Gueye and Davies.

Aubameyang notched Arsenal's top speed with 33.9 km/h.

So, back to the point. I reckon Gylfi was a 6/10 on Sunday, but could easily have had two assists and was among our top players in the majority of the departments where we want him to have an impact.
 
Carragher nailed it for me about this fraud.

He’s 29 and bar the odd screamer he’s been very poor

Look at my post about the stats.

He was the best player in a fair few categories on Sunday.

The main crux, imo?

He played four 'key passes'. That's basically 4 passes that led to a chance.

That was the highest of any player from either side.

Ramsey was Arsenal's highest with 2. He got 2 assists.

So, that says much more about our dreadful chance conversion than the player actually creating the opportunities in the first place.
 
I just posted this in the Bernard thread, so will repeat here.

I looked at his stats from Sunday on Opta.

Distribution wise, these were his numbers:

Total attempted passes 36 - that's the third most behind Davies (37) and Digne (38).

His overall passing accuracy was 86.1%. That's the second most of the whole team, with Walcott's 94.4% (from 18 passes) the highest.

Gylfi made 28 passes in the opposition half, more than any other player. Davies made 27 though so that shows he was also trying to push us forward.

Of those 28 passes, 85.7% were accurate. Compare that to 70.4% from Davies (purely comparable as they attempted a similar number of passes in the opposition half).

Gylfi played 4 'key passes' (passes that led to a chance, basically). That was the highest on our team, and also the highest in the game.

Arsenal's highest in that regard was Ramsey, with 2 key passes. Now, Ramsey got 2 assists from both his key passes, whereas Gylfi got none. That again backs up the point that Gylfi creates chances, we just don't put them away (i.e. Walcott on Sunday, Walcott v Southampton).

Gyfli put in 8 crosses in total, including set pieces. Digne put in the most (10).

Gyfli put in 3 'good crosses', 2 of which were from open play, so that shows his 5 of his set pieces were poor, which needs to improve. Digne put in 7 open play crosses, but only one 'good cross' in total (from 10 attempted). I know that's hard to validate because it's opinion sort of, but these are what the stats say.

Defensively, Gyfli won possession back 6 times. That's the second highest in our team behind Gana and Walcott (both 8). Gylfi conceded possession 16 times, level with Richarlison. Digne and Davies led the way in that regard (26 and 20 respectively).

Sigurdsson had a total of 62 touches, the third highest on the team. Digne and Kenny had more, which probably shows our issue - everything was to our full-backs too deep too often.

Finally, the player tracking stats.

Gylfi covered 11.99km, more than any other player on the pitch. Davies was the closest to him on our team, covering 11.83, with Digne not far behind.

Believe it or not, Gylfi was actually clocked as having the highest average speed in our side, with 7.39 km/h.

He sprinted 11 times.

Richarlison was clocked as the quickest player on our team in terms of top speed, as he reached 33.51 km/h. Richarlison sprinted 25 times.

Gylfi's top speed was 32.09 km/h. That is the fourth highest on the team behind Richarlison, Keane and DCL. So, just bare in mind, that's quicker than Walcott, Digne, Bernard, Gueye and Davies.

Aubameyang notched Arsenal's top speed with 33.9 km/h.

So, back to the point. I reckon Gylfi was a 6/10 on Sunday, but could easily have had two assists and was among our top players in the majority of the departments where we want him to have an impact.
Mods, another Rickyrider multi here
 
I just posted this in the Bernard thread, so will repeat here.

I looked at his stats from Sunday on Opta.

Distribution wise, these were his numbers:

Total attempted passes 36 - that's the third most behind Davies (37) and Digne (38).

His overall passing accuracy was 86.1%. That's the second most of the whole team, with Walcott's 94.4% (from 18 passes) the highest.

Gylfi made 28 passes in the opposition half, more than any other player. Davies made 27 though so that shows he was also trying to push us forward.

Of those 28 passes, 85.7% were accurate. Compare that to 70.4% from Davies (purely comparable as they attempted a similar number of passes in the opposition half).

Gylfi played 4 'key passes' (passes that led to a chance, basically). That was the highest on our team, and also the highest in the game.

Arsenal's highest in that regard was Ramsey, with 2 key passes. Now, Ramsey got 2 assists from both his key passes, whereas Gylfi got none. That again backs up the point that Gylfi creates chances, we just don't put them away (i.e. Walcott on Sunday, Walcott v Southampton).

Gyfli put in 8 crosses in total, including set pieces. Digne put in the most (10).

Gyfli put in 3 'good crosses', 2 of which were from open play, so that shows his 5 of his set pieces were poor, which needs to improve. Digne put in 7 open play crosses, but only one 'good cross' in total (from 10 attempted). I know that's hard to validate because it's opinion sort of, but these are what the stats say.

Defensively, Gyfli won possession back 6 times. That's the second highest in our team behind Gana and Walcott (both 8). Gylfi conceded possession 16 times, level with Richarlison. Digne and Davies led the way in that regard (26 and 20 respectively).

Sigurdsson had a total of 62 touches, the third highest on the team. Digne and Kenny had more, which probably shows our issue - everything was to our full-backs too deep too often.

Finally, the player tracking stats.

Gylfi covered 11.99km, more than any other player on the pitch. Davies was the closest to him on our team, covering 11.83, with Digne not far behind.

Believe it or not, Gylfi was actually clocked as having the highest average speed in our side, with 7.39 km/h.

He sprinted 11 times.

Richarlison was clocked as the quickest player on our team in terms of top speed, as he reached 33.51 km/h. Richarlison sprinted 25 times.

Gylfi's top speed was 32.09 km/h. That is the fourth highest on the team behind Richarlison, Keane and DCL. So, just bare in mind, that's quicker than Walcott, Digne, Bernard, Gueye and Davies.

Aubameyang notched Arsenal's top speed with 33.9 km/h.

So, back to the point. I reckon Gylfi was a 6/10 on Sunday, but could easily have had two assists and was among our top players in the majority of the departments where we want him to have an impact.

None of these stats mean anything though!

We lost, it's the only stat that matters.
 

I just posted this in the Bernard thread, so will repeat here.

I looked at his stats from Sunday on Opta.

Distribution wise, these were his numbers:

Total attempted passes 36 - that's the third most behind Davies (37) and Digne (38).

His overall passing accuracy was 86.1%. That's the second most of the whole team, with Walcott's 94.4% (from 18 passes) the highest.

Gylfi made 28 passes in the opposition half, more than any other player. Davies made 27 though so that shows he was also trying to push us forward.

Of those 28 passes, 85.7% were accurate. Compare that to 70.4% from Davies (purely comparable as they attempted a similar number of passes in the opposition half).

Gylfi played 4 'key passes' (passes that led to a chance, basically). That was the highest on our team, and also the highest in the game.

Arsenal's highest in that regard was Ramsey, with 2 key passes. Now, Ramsey got 2 assists from both his key passes, whereas Gylfi got none. That again backs up the point that Gylfi creates chances, we just don't put them away (i.e. Walcott on Sunday, Walcott v Southampton).

Gyfli put in 8 crosses in total, including set pieces. Digne put in the most (10).

Gyfli put in 3 'good crosses', 2 of which were from open play, so that shows his 5 of his set pieces were poor, which needs to improve. Digne put in 7 open play crosses, but only one 'good cross' in total (from 10 attempted). I know that's hard to validate because it's opinion sort of, but these are what the stats say.

Defensively, Gyfli won possession back 6 times. That's the second highest in our team behind Gana and Walcott (both 8). Gylfi conceded possession 16 times, level with Richarlison. Digne and Davies led the way in that regard (26 and 20 respectively).

Sigurdsson had a total of 62 touches, the third highest on the team. Digne and Kenny had more, which probably shows our issue - everything was to our full-backs too deep too often.

Finally, the player tracking stats.

Gylfi covered 11.99km, more than any other player on the pitch. Davies was the closest to him on our team, covering 11.83, with Digne not far behind.

Believe it or not, Gylfi was actually clocked as having the highest average speed in our side, with 7.39 km/h.

He sprinted 11 times.

Richarlison was clocked as the quickest player on our team in terms of top speed, as he reached 33.51 km/h. Richarlison sprinted 25 times.

Gylfi's top speed was 32.09 km/h. That is the fourth highest on the team behind Richarlison, Keane and DCL. So, just bare in mind, that's quicker than Walcott, Digne, Bernard, Gueye and Davies.

Aubameyang notched Arsenal's top speed with 33.9 km/h.

So, back to the point. I reckon Gylfi was a 6/10 on Sunday, but could easily have had two assists and was among our top players in the majority of the departments where we want him to have an impact.

P, we lost though so this is all meaningless.

Pls don’t become Ricky V2 in defence of this fraud.
 
P, we lost though so this is all meaningless.

Pls don’t become Ricky V2 in defence of this fraud.

It's not meaningless C.

People say he was anonymous. He wasn't, and the stats back it up.

I hate the 'stats are meaningless' argument. They really aren't. They help prove certain opinions and disprove others (whether that's positive or negative).

People are great at saying 'oh, he was useless', without anything to back it up.

I did the same for Gueye the other day. Gueye wasn't great on the ball (and the stats back that up) but he was excellent defensively (and the stats prove he was the highest on the pitch in all the defensive categories).

I'm not really into the xG stuff, and there's some stats (like 'good crosses') that are definitely a bit wishy washy, but most of them are a solid way to help gauge a performance.
 
Well they do though, don't they...

No they don't! They really don't.

I have never ever watched a game and thought "What a great key pass that was" or "oh he won his duel well there"

It is utter nonsense and people are making money from it whilst people eat it up like gospel. It's utter madness.

You stat people are worse than flat earthers.
 
No they don't! They really don't.

I have never ever watched a game and thought "What a great key pass that was" or "oh he won his duel well there"

It is utter nonsense and people are making money from it whilst people eat it up like gospel. It's utter madness.

You stat people are worse than flat earthers.

I work for the company that own Opta. They make money from selling the stats to broadcasters, yes, but their main market is they sell to the individual leagues/organisations, which distribute them to the teams, who use them - along with their own levels of tracking - to gauge player performances.

Nobody is saying that it should be taken as gospel.

But they are used to help see how a player is performing.

People shouldn't say 'he was anonymous' without knowing that they can back it up?

You mention key passes.

The biggest criticism of Gylfi is 'he doesn't create enough', which is absolute bull, because he does create a lot - he's our most creative player.

On Sunday, he was - by definition - the most creative player on the park. That creativity didn't lead to a goal, which is part of the problem.

Another is that he's slow, yet he was averaging our highest speed...

I'm not suggesting he doesn't need to improve. He didn't have his best game, but the stats show that he was still one of our highest performers in a number of areas. So does that say more about the team or Gylfi?
 

I just lobbed that in there to have all three areas covered

- Attacking
- Defensive
- Physical

But jogging around space doesn’t actually mean anything, nor does the speed in which he jogged around that space. The stats may show that he covered more ground than Gana, but who was actually more effective in covering that ground? Gana closed off passing avenues, made tackles, interceptions, Sigurdsson did what? This is why football simply is not a numbers game, other than the number on the scoreboard.
 
Look at my post about the stats.

He was the best player in a fair few categories on Sunday.

The main crux, imo?

He played four 'key passes'. That's basically 4 passes that led to a chance.

That was the highest of any player from either side.

Ramsey was Arsenal's highest with 2. He got 2 assists.

So, that says much more about our dreadful chance conversion than the player actually creating the opportunities in the first place.

aren't half blag them "stats"

the two big chances for DCL ( come from a good davies pass ) and Walcott ( come from Walcott winning the ball back didn't it )

so what passes where these? was it the long ball where he just chested it down and richarlison had a pop, would hardly call stuff like that a key pass
 
aren't half blag them "stats"

the two big chances for DCL ( come from a good davies pass ) and Walcott ( come from Walcott winning the ball back didn't it )

so what passes where these? was it the long ball where he just chested it down and richarlison had a pop, would hardly call stuff like that a key pass

He slid Walcott through with a nice ball, and that is genuinely the only time I can remember him splitting the defence with a through ball to put one of our players through on goal since he arrived at the club.
 

Status
Not open for further replies.

Welcome

Join Grand Old Team to get involved in the Everton discussion. Signing up is quick, easy, and completely free.

Back
Top