Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Richarlison can’t be the only one demanding the ball. For all of Barkley’s faults, he’d carry the ball and relieve pressure on other players. Southampton is the only game where he was involved enough to influence the game without scoring. He won free kicks and was constantly involved in the build up. Need to see more of that as wellFour goals in seven games, on for 20+ and people moan more about the bad things he does like "not grabbing the game by the scruff of the neck"
Just because others were poor does not mean he wasn't as well.
Richarlison can’t be the only one demanding the ball. For all of Barkley’s faults, he’d carry the ball and relieve pressure on other players. Southampton is the only game where he was involved enough to influence the game without scoring. He won free kicks and was constantly involved in the build up. Need to see more of that as well
Four goals in seven games, on for 20+ and people moan more about the bad things he does like "not grabbing the game by the scruff of the neck"
I agree with that and hope Gomes is exactly what we need him to be, but it kinda makes my point that he isn’t the best fit without a ball carrier. As long as he scores goals though, it doesn’t really matter.Gyfli isn't a 'ball carrier' though. He isn't a deep lying playmaker. So people need to stop expecting him to be. It's absolutely 100% fine to expect more, but let's expect more from him at what he's good at, and not what he isn't, if you get me?
He is constantly involved in the build up when we get the ball up the pitch quickly. But if he's dropping deep to get on the ball, then we have nobody in the space that he occupies.
Ergo, it's why what the most important thing this team needs right now (with the players we currently have) is to get a midfielder in who can be the ball carrier, who can be the passer in a slightly deeper role. I'm hopeful it can be Gomes. Not in the same way Ross was, maybe, but in the way he can get the ball and pick a pass that Davies/Gana/Schneiderlin can't.
We look better with Davies/Gana because at least Davies tries to get it forward, even if he lacks the final application of it.
I agree with that and hope Gomes is exactly what we need him to be, but it kinda makes my point that he isn’t the best fit without a ball carrier. As long as he scores goals though, it doesn’t really matter.
Richarlison can’t be the only one demanding the ball. For all of Barkley’s faults, he’d carry the ball and relieve pressure on other players. Southampton is the only game where he was involved enough to influence the game without scoring. He won free kicks and was constantly involved in the build up. Need to see more of that as well
Agreed yes, barkley has more talent but I believe he's wasted it. He's a shadow of the player he should have been.