He literally explains the whole thing if you scroll up about 5cm.what's an expected assist? how is that a thing?
that's like saying we should play DCL up front because I expect him to get 927 goals this season???
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
He literally explains the whole thing if you scroll up about 5cm.what's an expected assist? how is that a thing?
that's like saying we should play DCL up front because I expect him to get 927 goals this season???
He literally explains the whole thing if you scroll up about 5cm.
I agree that the stat is a bit of a weird one but not for that reason. You're misunderstanding the concept of it. If Tosun has a high expected goal rate but a low actual goal rate, it would be a bad thing. It wouldn't be used to say 'it's not his fault, he's unlucky' it would be used to say he should be scoring more than he is, we need a better finisher. That's slightly different with assists because you're talking about a reliance on someone else, so to an extent you can say 'he couldn't really have done any more there, it's just poor finishing'.no I did read it, again how is that a thing it's absolutely ridiculous
ie, lets say tosun who has what 3 goals? we all think he's not good enough which he quite clearly isn't, what if I pulled some jarg stat out saying he has an expected goal per game, it's not his fault the keepers keep making good saves against him, as other players would score this chance he is just very unlucky that at this time the keeper made a good save
For me stats and analytics are good to give credence/balance to an argument, but actually watching and understanding a game of football is a much better way of judging players.
Someone better tell the Premier League to change the requirements for the golden boot because apparently number of goals scored doesn't mean anything
I know. And you are still wrong.
Klaassen cost like £25 million and played 250 minutes for us in the Premier League, this isn't even an argument.
because your using daft articles/stats and comparing them to a FAR superior player as a way of telling us how he's not doing to bad, when in reality he is doing bad
for arguments sake I've just skim read that article and it has siggy being better than eriken in stuff like goals ( siggy has taken a few pens ) and it even has him ahead in duels/dribbling who is arsed abar them 2?
the most important one needed as follows...
"In terms of passes, Sigurdsson is involved in substantially less than Eriksen. He averages just 27.12 passes per 90 minutes with a success rate of 74.7%. Eriksen, however, averages 53.92 passes per 90 minutes with a success rate of 83.1%".
thanks for listening
For me stats and analytics are good to give credence/balance to an argument, but actually watching and understanding a game of football is a much better way of judging players.
Stats without an understanding of the game, what’s most important to you club in what type of player, is pointless. Most analytics folks know this. But there are a lot of folks that claim they know the game and don’t know anything. Frankly, if you could measure everything at every time, someone could probably create a model mixed with machine learning that would outperform pretty much every scout. But you still have to create a model.
Regardless, I still don’t understand why a guy that works as hard as he does gets is the subject of so much ire from so many. Just boggles my mind.
I thought you already said you don’t use stats?
I love it when someone says that they use their eyes to judge players and not stats. That’s one of my favorites.
What a run Walsh & Koeman had, I defy any DOF to top that lollolAbsolutely isn't mate.
Are we forgetting about Bolasie, Klaasen or Tosun?
lolzTook you about 4 days to think of that lad?