Of which I agree 100%.Nobody is saying he's perfect. But without him we would have even less goal threat.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Of which I agree 100%.Nobody is saying he's perfect. But without him we would have even less goal threat.
The 2nd half was another example of why we need more from his position.
We were overrun in midfield and couldn't keep the ball. He runs about, closes players down but doesn't get on the ball, doesn't keep it. Hence we get put under pressure.
The last couple of minutes when he kept it and ran to the corner flag is what you want a player in his position to do but not to run the clock down.
Your gripe is with Gomes and Gbamin, who dwelt on and gave the ball away continuously from about half an hour in. It doesn't look to me like this is the job Sigurdsson is given in the 4-2-3-1. He's much closer to the front 3 than the midfield (there's an average position chart from Palace going around showing that he was higher up the park than DCL). Not far off being a second striker. He's clearly asked to press as high as the striker and is probably pushed that high because we don't have a goalscorer in that position.
If we had signed Doucoure i think Sigurdsson would be rotated.
Was anonymous for 90% of the game.
Crap, glad we didn’t
Crap, glad we didn’t
As for gylfi, time to get benched and try a different approach. It’s tedious now watching him go missing
Thats why we went for doucoure i think...2 physical players in Gbamin and Doucoure next to Gomes. I dont think Gomes is soft either.
Wouldnt surprise me if we were in for a similar type of midfielder to ease Sigurdsson out gradually.
If we had signed Doucoure i think Sigurdsson would be rotated.
Was anonymous for 90% of the game.